|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
| OK, got the first version working!
That damn document from above -> https://freeworld.thc.org/papers/thc-orakelsniffert.pdf
I lost nearly a week till I realized that this block is invalid:
Qu... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
29,773 |
03-21-2012, 03:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
| Did another optimization, 400 Mhash/s mark broken :-) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
29,773 |
03-22-2012, 07:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
| its already released, see v0.08 |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
29,773 |
05-03-2012, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 10 hash type
Post: RE: Oracle 10 hash type
| oracle 10 is supported with oclHashcat only (gpu version) on which it is -m 3100, you propably tried hashcat (cpu version)
the format is hash:username
see https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=exampl... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,325 |
07-25-2014, 05:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle (old 7-10g) hashes
Post: RE: Oracle (old 7-10g) hashes
| case does not matter. oclHashcat-plus internally converts them to uppercase. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
7,945 |
07-16-2012, 10:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Optimized dictionary for WPA
Post: RE: Optimized dictionary for WPA
|
JulioQc Wrote: (12-11-2013, 11:13 PM)
--
try crunch as a word generator, can be piped or used to create a file
--
wrong hint, maskprocessor can do the same but faster.
you won't neccessarily nee... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
18,006 |
12-12-2013, 04:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Optimize MD5 hashcat for triple-core (MMX+ALU)
Post: RE: Optimize MD5 hashcat for triple-core (MMX+ALU)
| hashcat uses sse2 instructions which are nearly twice as fast as mmx instructions |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
8,782 |
07-28-2010, 04:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Optimize MD5 brute force attack
Post: RE: Optimize MD5 brute force attack
| with new plus version you have to specify what type of attack you are doing. from your commandline i can see you want to do brute-force, so you have to add -a 3 to cmdline. also you dont need to split... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
10,627 |
01-02-2012, 11:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Openwall cracker ?!
Post: RE: Openwall cracker ?!
| Keep cool, there's no magic involved.
What this program is using is a technique called bitslice. DES based algorithms like LM can be improved alot by using bitslice compared to "traditional" techni... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,026 |
01-27-2014, 07:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: openssl & gost
Post: RE: openssl & gost
| 1. not supported, sorry
2. see here: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,177 |
05-15-2014, 08:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| All right, will do that for oclHashcat-lite and oclHashcat-plus. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
04-10-2012, 05:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| I am not sure, but maybe its just the salt length that differs. With a dynamic salt length parser this problem should disappear. If I am wrong please correct me. In this case I can save some work :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
04-11-2012, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| implemented in latest oclHashcat-lite v0.10 beta. please try |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
05-05-2012, 10:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| Its already done, just wait for the release |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
07-31-2012, 02:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
09-07-2012, 05:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: openLDAP Hashes
Post: RE: openLDAP Hashes
| very nice, answering own questions are the best, gz |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
6,176 |
08-17-2016, 05:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL.dll Problem
Post: RE: OpenCL.dll Problem
| If you are on NVidia you have to take cudaHashcat, not oclHashcat. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
15,455 |
05-27-2012, 04:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Opencl.dll is missing
Post: RE: Opencl.dll is missing
| You haven't installed the driver properbly, otherwise you would have it located in c:\windows\ or so. Please run driver fusion free version to clean uninstall your current driver setup and then run 13... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
69,955 |
06-13-2013, 12:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL Platform #3: The pocl project
Post: RE: OpenCL Platform #3: The pocl project
| If you have Intel OpenCL runtime then pocl will be disabled because its slower and more unstable. If you want to try out pocl remove the Intel OpenCL runtime and then use -D 1,2 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
4,318 |
07-30-2018, 07:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL Platform #1: Mesa, skipped! No OpenCL compatible devices found
Post: RE: OpenCL Platform #1: Mesa, skipped! No OpenCL c...
| You need to install an OpenCL runtime for your CPU |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
10,263 |
12-26-2016, 11:12 PM |
