Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
In fact, I would love to see it beaten. We will all benefit from it.
GOGOGOGO Guys!!
|
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-22-2012, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
hashcat 0.39 released, now everybody can participate |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-23-2012, 11:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-25-2012, 01:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Should be back, it was just limited to the top 10 |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-27-2012, 03:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
This is the write-up how I rebuild the new best64.rule out of all the submissions but for real-life use.
This new best64.rule will go into all hashcat distributions.
I took arex best 80's results po... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-30-2012, 02:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: Finding some weird features (rules)
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
there is something wrong with your test, because $1@1u should find it. you sure you tried it correct? here is my log on which you will see its found:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.40# cat > hash
1b... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
25,304 |
03-30-2012, 11:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
the post was not deleted, just splitted into a seperate thread, since this thread is about the challange, not about strange rule engine behaiviors. please read the https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1027... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-31-2012, 12:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
frekvent Wrote: (03-31-2012, 12:10 AM)
--
It turns out that "}}D1{" can be simplified to a single "]".
--
This is cool. I will update the post and the best64.rule. Thanks! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-31-2012, 12:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Thanks to dakykilla:
Quote:
--
o0to0b o0t o0b
--
can be written as just "o0b" :) |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
04-21-2012, 10:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Its all about the slow ones, like md5crypt, phpass, WPA/WPA2... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
05-06-2012, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Office hash trouble
Post: RE: Office hash trouble
I think office2john.py adds additional columns on both sides, left and right. Double check your modification |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,319 |
07-29-2017, 05:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: office excel 2010 hash
Post: RE: office excel 2010 hash
Do you know the password? Is it 8 lowercase letters?
Also there's an error in your commandline: It says ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?1 but maybe you want ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
12,523 |
04-15-2015, 12:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: office excel 2010 hash
Post: RE: office excel 2010 hash
you can slightly increase the performance using -w 3 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
12,523 |
04-29-2015, 03:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Office collision: 7 or more characters?
Post: RE: Office collision: 7 or more characters?
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,027 |
12-26-2016, 11:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Office collision: 7 or more characters?
Post: RE: Office collision: 7 or more characters?
Well, MD5 is 128 bit while RC4 (in this case) is only 40 bit. The mode #2 is not made to find collisions, it's more to find the correct password used. Having the correct password gives you the chance ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,027 |
12-29-2016, 11:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: Office 2016?
Post: RE: Office 2016?
Good question, are they different to Office 2013? |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
4,299 |
07-05-2017, 06:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Odd Formatting Using Tables
Post: RE: Odd Formatting Using Tables
this is because of the SSE2 implementation. insert len.bin in between your pipe and build a chain. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
8,824 |
11-22-2011, 05:42 AM |
|
|
Thread: Odd Formatting Using Tables
Post: RE: Odd Formatting Using Tables
if you use hashcat and --stdout as wordlist generator in combination with oclHashcat-plus, then no, you did not. it skips empty lines :) |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
8,824 |
11-22-2011, 08:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Odd bug with hashcat-0.39 and SHA-512(Unix) hashes
Post: RE: Odd bug with hashcat-0.39 and SHA-512(Unix) ha...
I can reproduce it. I am pretty busy with oclHashcat, it might take some time to fix it. Many thanks for report! |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,030 |
06-08-2012, 10:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: Odd Bruteforce Issue
Post: RE: Odd Bruteforce Issue
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,501 |
04-24-2015, 01:30 AM |