|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - cracking wpa
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
| currently working on that on the new wiki |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,960 |
10-10-2011, 12:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - cracking wpa
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
| there it is: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=cracking_wpawpa2 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,960 |
10-24-2011, 12:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - brute-force attack
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
| its not a easy task so it will take some time. but you can already bruteforce md5crypt. take a looks at our wiki pages: https://hashcat.net/wiki/brute_force_in_oclhashcat_plus |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
12,190 |
10-27-2011, 09:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus throws an error?!
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus throws an error?!
| thanks for reporting back |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,201 |
05-16-2013, 06:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus silently truncates password candidates to 15 characters
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus silently truncates password ca...
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
12,517 |
05-08-2012, 04:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus sees only 2GB on sapphire HD 7950 vapor-X
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus sees only 2GB on sapphire HD 7...
| AMD's OpenCL runtime does not allow the use of all memory, see this: https://twitter.com/hashcat/status/373100787108282368 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,898 |
11-04-2013, 05:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus restore file format struct
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus restore file format struct
| The format is about to change with new release. Once I've released it, I will also release new struct, OK? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,999 |
06-17-2013, 12:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus restore file format struct
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus restore file format struct
| No, thats not possible for oclHashcat-plus. It's much more complicated. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,999 |
06-18-2013, 12:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus restore file format struct
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus restore file format struct
| The struct is here, but note it will change again with oclHashcat v1.00.
Code:
--
typedef struct
{
uint32_t version_bin;
char cwd[256];
uint32_t argc;
char **argv;
ui... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,999 |
09-05-2013, 02:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus Min/Max length for candidate plain
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus Min/Max length for candidate p...
| This is not possible, at least not for the fast algorithms like MD5 because of how the combinator engine and the rule engine is designed. That works for the slow algorithms like WPA and md5crypt. For ... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
8,487 |
01-26-2012, 06:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus mask batchscript
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus mask batchscript
| Updated the section on wiki |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,925 |
11-05-2012, 11:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
| Exactly, but, empty string checks will be added in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,496 |
05-21-2012, 06:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013 :P?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013...
| I do have a v0.10 beta ready for release. The problem why I dont do is more because of the catalyst driver. If I do a release, it will be for catalyst 12.8 which is very old now. But all the later one... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,921 |
12-31-2012, 04:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013 :P?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013...
| I am preparing for release, give me a few hours |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,921 |
12-31-2012, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus crashes on 7970 (Linux & Windows)
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus crashes on 7970 (Linux & Windo...
| Yes. oclHashcat-plus v0.07 does not support hd7970. oclHashcat-plus v0.08 beta does, but is not public accessible. You have to be patient. In the meanwhile you can use oclHashcat-lite for tests with t... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,695 |
03-29-2012, 10:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| Thanks guys. I'm not sure if it's taped, question for epixoip :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 03:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| The speeds on RipeMD160 will improve again once AMD fixes this confirmed bug:
https://devgurus.amd.com/thread/166396
Currently I have to workaround this which makes the code a little bit slower. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| No, I'm working on > length 15 support. If I'm done with that, I will release. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 05:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| Thanks for the benchmarks!
As I said, there was potential to improve the Whirlpool hash. I've just finished implementing it.
On my 2x hd6990 speed increased from 31 kHash/s to 49 kHash/s.
--
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-18-2013, 03:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| well, in theory - yes. in practice - no :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
06-11-2013, 05:37 PM |
