|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
| The gtx680 is at 760 khash/s (estimated)
The hd7970 is at 3200 khash/s (latest beta) |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
23 |
70,083 |
04-25-2012, 04:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite crash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite crash
| can you please post the exact commandline so we can try to reproduce |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
7 |
12,913 |
03-26-2013, 12:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite crash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite crash
| OK, cool, Thanks for the info. Thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
7 |
12,913 |
04-19-2013, 10:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
Post: RE: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
| hashcat cheats for unicode algorithms like NTLM, it just inserts zeros |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
14,129 |
09-05-2013, 02:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
Post: RE: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
| All the GPGPU cracking tools that support fast hashes do it this way, it's because it does not harm to ASCII based ^ 95 charset. It gives a lot more speed to do it this way but it's hard to predict a ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
14,129 |
09-06-2013, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
Post: RE: oclHashcat-Lite and ?h mask
| You can trick a bit with NTLM by using MD4 instead of NTLM and using the tricks explained in rurapenthes latest blogpost: https://www.rurapenthe.me/2013/09/cracking-hashes-with-other-language.html
J... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
14,129 |
09-10-2013, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite : New Feature : Internal benchmark
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite : New Feature : Internal bench...
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,604 |
06-09-2012, 04:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite 0.09 linux x64 hd5970 50% GPU Usage
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite 0.09 linux x64 hd5970 50% GPU ...
| You used Catalyst 12.4 or 12.9 beta? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
12,067 |
10-17-2012, 01:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-0.25 on GeForce GTX 570 running Fedora 13 x86_64
Post: RE: oclHashcat-0.25 on GeForce GTX 570 running Fed...
| cd to installation directory and check if you have that file ./kernels/4318/m0000.sm_20.64.cubin |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
11,207 |
03-19-2011, 06:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
| The 2nd core of the hd5970 is only supported on linux (by using a undocumented variable). Officially the 2nd core of the hd5970 is not supported by OpenCL :-( As a workaround you can use the -d 1 swit... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,327 |
01-23-2011, 06:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
| my hd5970 in multihash mode makes ~3800M/s on two hashes and 2900M/s on 6500 hashes. so your paste is showing a hd5970 with both cores running.
for a good performance check use this command: oclHashc... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,327 |
01-24-2011, 02:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashCat, AMD R9 290x, Windows - works, but reboots at random.
Post: RE: oclHashCat, AMD R9 290x, Windows - works, but ...
| It's a general AMD OpenCL runtime limitation |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,512 |
09-13-2014, 08:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat+ v0.12 does not see the second card
Post: RE: oclhashcat+ v0.12 does not see the second card
| clinfo doesnt see it, too. only 1 gpu and 1 cpu. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,895 |
04-23-2013, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
Post: RE: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
| its good an experienced user could not reproduce it since i do not have such a card to try it myself |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,988 |
04-26-2012, 10:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
Post: RE: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
| the sdk must be uninstalled otherwise it wont work. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,988 |
04-26-2012, 02:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat+ help
Post: RE: oclhashcat+ help
| please give more detailed informations so that we can reproduce the problem. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
03-10-2011, 06:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat+ help
Post: RE: oclhashcat+ help
| can you please try again after removing the crossfire hardware bridge? i have been told it creates a lot of problems in gpgpu. oclHashcat handles each device seperatly with its own scheduler. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
03-11-2011, 11:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| what the problem using hashcat to do the --remove work? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-04-2011, 10:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| you may need to cut away the hashes. use cut (port also exists for windows) from unix utils package.
cut -b34- < foundpasswords.txt > foundpasswords.txt.cut
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-05-2011, 10:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| true. i will add it to oclhashcat+ in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-09-2011, 10:39 AM |
