|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| thats something it will do if it has --remove switch. till then, use hashcat cpu version to do it / see how it behaves |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-13-2011, 08:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| has been added in the meanwhile. thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
10-24-2011, 12:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat without window manager
Post: RE: oclHashcat without window manager
| The main problem is that all drivers > catalyst 12.8 are very unstable (and slow). So you should stick to catalyst 12.8. Btw, X11 is not decreasing your cracking rates. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
12,783 |
12-30-2012, 11:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat without window manager
Post: RE: oclHashcat without window manager
| The speed loss is mainly on SHA1 based algorithms, not MD4. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
12,783 |
01-02-2013, 12:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
| Did you make sure to have no words >= length 32 inside your dictionaries? That's the difference between both programs.
There's also a huge difference between b53 and b57, please try again with b57.... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 11:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
| Yeah please post commandline. As mastercracker correctly said, it's a new check. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
| getops allows the usage of -o between two arguments, but the function that tries to find out if the input hashfile and the outfile is the same seems not to work on windows. please wait for a fix |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
| There's a new .exe at https://hashcat.net/beta
Please replace with the existing one and try again.
I can't test since I do not have access to windows system right now.
It's possible that it w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat version 2.10, FPGA support?
Post: RE: oclHashcat version 2.10, FPGA support?
| Latest oclHashcat beta (on github) supports all OpenCL platforms and all OpenCL device types. If the vendor of that FPGA provides such a OpenCL runtime, it should work. If it does, tell me :) |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,632 |
03-16-2016, 09:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) add a rule (important!) and 2) add -w 3 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-27-2016, 10:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-27-2016, 11:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| I think you're confusing hashcat and oclHashcat here, is that possible? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-28-2016, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-29-2016, 09:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.36
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36
| -m 10700 -b --benchmark-mode 0 -u 1024 -n 1 then increase the -n value to find the sweet spot |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
12 |
45,557 |
04-27-2015, 01:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.36
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36
| take the one from the example hash page |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
12 |
45,557 |
04-28-2015, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.34
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.34
| Yeah I can reproduce, working on it |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
7 |
17,446 |
03-22-2015, 12:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.34
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.34
| There will be oclHashcat v1.35 in a few hours. Please update.
Thanks for reporting so fast! |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
7 |
17,446 |
03-22-2015, 03:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
| Here's the log that I had with undeath, it explains it in detail:
Quote:
--
18:28:25 undeath | atom: it really seems something messed up from 1.31 to 1.32, cudaExample0 is almost twice as slow
1... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,910 |
02-26-2015, 08:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,910 |
02-28-2015, 05:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.33
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.33
| Important!!
There was a bug in the CUDA version related to PDF kernel, only affecting the performance. I've upload a new kernelpack to fix this problem: https://hashcat.net/files/cudaHashcat-1.33-n... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
17 |
40,097 |
02-19-2015, 01:41 PM |
