|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.24
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.24
| because of the core refactorization. it comes back in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
2 |
16,105 |
02-08-2011, 10:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.23 --ERROR
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.23 --ERROR
| this is a known issue. usage of the 2nd unsupported gpu on hd5970 results in unexpected results. do not use it, see https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-73.html how to avoid it. btw cat v10.8 is already ou... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,491 |
08-28-2010, 09:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.23
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.23
| it possible to add it to oclHashcat. but not in the near future since there are other tasks that have higher priority such as adding md5crypt or phpass. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
1 |
11,314 |
08-26-2010, 11:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| it is still on position 0/98948190, wait until it increases. then it should show a value. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 01:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| made speed display more user-friendly with dynamic suffixes means M/s, k/s or just /s depending on the speed value. old version shows M/s only which means on very low speed it would show 0M/s even it ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 02:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
|
Quote:
--
This can`t be true !
--
uhm, moment! you changed the attack. initial post showed:
Progress..: 0/98948190 (0.00%)
now its is:
Progress..: 131072/344011 (38.10%)
Quote:
--
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 04:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
|
Quote:
--
If you think that this is normal - OK, you know better, I just want to help ...
--
yes, please continue doing that! critic is very welcome here. just in case you understood me wrong.
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 06:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| fixed with oclHashcat v0.25 :-) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
01-31-2011, 06:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
|
xiaozhi Wrote: (05-23-2010, 12:28 PM)
--
why cannt the application work?
environment:win 7 64bit Catalyst 10.4 and ATI Stream SDK v2.1 oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970
here is a photo
xp 32bit
--
plea... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,802 |
05-23-2010, 07:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| we have tested the HD5970 a lot. there are no known problems. do you have tried running other opencl applications (just to make sure your driver installations and the card are working)? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,802 |
05-25-2010, 09:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| please try it exactly this way:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -n 80 --gpu-loops 1024 -m 0 -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1
if this does not work, same problem was reported and solved here: https://hashcat.ne... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,802 |
05-25-2010, 02:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| update: hd5970 (also multiple hd5970) work now on linux, but not on windows. we still have to wait for newer SDK. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,802 |
01-31-2011, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
Post: RE: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
| gee, i remember there was such an issue in a very old oclhashcat version. i can not reproduce this on v0.23. neither on ATI nor on NV. make sure you have the latest version installed. oh and v0.24 is ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,949 |
10-26-2010, 09:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
Post: RE: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
| for plain dictionary attack use cpu hashcat |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,949 |
10-27-2010, 07:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
Post: RE: OCLHashCat V.24 When?
| update: use either hashcat or oclHashcat+ |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,949 |
01-31-2011, 06:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat speed
Post: RE: oclHashcat speed
| Check out this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,516 |
05-23-2015, 07:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat speed
Post: RE: oclHashcat speed
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,516 |
05-23-2015, 08:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat speed
Post: RE: oclHashcat speed
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,516 |
05-23-2015, 09:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat SE
Post: RE: oclhashcat SE
| oclHashcat already uses single hash optimizations, you can see it especially on cards which support bitalign. if you are refering on MD5 reversing techniques (+25 %) i will not add them. that does not... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
6,931 |
07-16-2010, 01:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat SE
Post: RE: oclhashcat SE
| done. latest oclHashcat-lite supports this. thread closed. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
6,931 |
11-19-2011, 07:34 PM |
