|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
| at least it's known the 7990 works with v1.30 and 14.6b |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
23,610 |
09-22-2014, 11:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.20 - Reload previously-cracked hashes from potfile
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.20 - Reload previously-cracked ha...
| you might want to use --show instead |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,152 |
05-05-2014, 03:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| You're missing a space after -m 2500 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-12-2013, 04:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| Please close the thread if the problem is solved. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-12-2013, 04:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| Do not use AMD APP SDK if you want to run oclHashcat. Make sure it's not installed. It's the primary source for strange errors on linux. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-13-2013, 06:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 0.22 error
Post: RE: oclhashcat 0.22 error
| how did you manage to disabled crossfire? this is the well known and often discussed HD5970 (cypress) crossfirex ATI driver problem. i have exactly the same error on my card and there is currently no ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,144 |
07-16-2010, 01:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 0.22 error
Post: RE: oclhashcat 0.22 error
| you need to have crossfirex disabled. oh and there is another thing. on ATI, you need to have the cards connected to monitor. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,144 |
07-19-2010, 09:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 0.15 Segmentation fault
Post: RE: oclHashcat 0.15 Segmentation fault
| Always those The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) errors. Have anyever ever got it to work? Maybe we need a how-to-run-oclHashcat-on-The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,740 |
10-07-2013, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
Post: RE: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
| i tried your oclHashcat.restore file and it worked fine for me (after modifying it so that it matches my configuration). what makes you believe it starts from 0? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
12,715 |
07-28-2010, 03:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
Post: RE: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
| very strange. i tried but failed to reproduce this on linux. maybe this is an windows related problem. i will try it again in the next days when i hopefully get back access to my windows development m... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
12,715 |
07-29-2010, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
Post: RE: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
| yes, that was a 64 bit issue. my cross compiler did something wrong. i workarounded the problem. please test in next release or come to IRC to get the beta. however, this was only a display error. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
12,715 |
09-20-2010, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
Post: RE: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
| as you said, hashcat is very fast in doing dictionary attack. even on my biggest wordlists that are greater than 1gb it is finished in less than a minute. why adding dictionary attack on oclHashcat? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,362 |
06-01-2010, 09:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
Post: RE: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,362 |
01-31-2011, 05:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat - ntlmv2 - question
Post: RE: oclhashcat - ntlmv2 - question
| 1) yes
2 will a partial clear-text be retrieved) no
2 must give a 8-char mask) yes
3) no, that makes no sense anyway |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,784 |
04-21-2015, 03:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat - limit amount of wordlist words for left mask
Post: RE: oclHashcat - limit amount of wordlist words fo...
| no, its already doing the caching. reasons for your speed must be something different. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
7,303 |
08-24-2011, 09:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat - ERROR: clBuildProgram() -42
Post: RE: oclhashcat - ERROR: clBuildProgram() -42
| thanks for info. i have updated the oclHashcat page. only the 8800 GTS 512MB version supports sm_11. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
11,561 |
08-05-2010, 09:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat - ERROR: clBuildProgram() -42
Post: RE: oclhashcat - ERROR: clBuildProgram() -42
| the 8800GTX is not supported. its because of its gpu architecture. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
11,561 |
08-09-2010, 07:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat - ERROR: clBuildProgram() -42
Post: RE: oclhashcat - ERROR: clBuildProgram() -42
| latest nvidia driver and oclHashcat v0.25 fixes this (finally sm_10 support) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
11,561 |
01-31-2011, 06:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat + GTX580
Post: RE: oclHashcat + GTX580
| yes, there is. but i am not sure if they work on 580. check PM. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
4 |
14,288 |
11-18-2010, 08:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| if left side is of length 4, 8 or 12 its most performant. there is one exception if you get this warning:
WARNING: words in dict_left < .... Can't gain full performance
in this case its better to p... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-13-2010, 02:43 PM |
