|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: V56 is up
Post: RE: V56 is up
| Thanks for the test results, very very very helpful. Indeed I focuses on amd mostly, but will not try to fix stuff on nvidia, too.
This bugfixing round was really neccessary :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
7,924 |
08-31-2012, 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V56 is up
Post: RE: V56 is up
| continue here pls:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1520.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
7,924 |
08-31-2012, 02:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with SHA256 and hyphenated salt
Post: RE: Problem with SHA256 and hyphenated salt
| not a bug, simply just not supported. max salt length is 32 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,920 |
07-14-2014, 06:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with SHA256 and hyphenated salt
Post: RE: Problem with SHA256 and hyphenated salt
| Not in the generic hash types. But if it's an interessting hash and we add it as a new hash-mode it's possible, all lengths |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,920 |
07-14-2014, 07:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: First contact. Help please.
Post: RE: First contact. Help please.
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxa0JTJ29II |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
7,912 |
09-11-2011, 12:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateContext() : -2 : CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateContext() : -2 : CL_UNKNOWN_ERR...
| It's a pure OpenCL runtime error. Not Hashcat fault, 100%. Sorry. All I can think of is to true a different OpenCL runtime. For example POCL, but that requires you to install Linux. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,908 |
07-01-2016, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateContext() : -2 : CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateContext() : -2 : CL_UNKNOWN_ERR...
| You maybe need to uninstall intel opencl sdk, then remove opencl.dll and opencl32.dll manually, then reinstall intel opencl sdk. in that order and with a reboot in between each step. That one helped a... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,908 |
07-04-2016, 12:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| There's no difference, performance-wise |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 02:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| I think you're confusing what we mean with "performance". That is the number of passwords candidates that are generated in a specific time. It has no relation in how likely such a guess is. That's why... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 03:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| I think royce explained it pretty well. In real life, forensics, pentester and others that do hash cracking as part of their job have no time to attend the process of hash cracking. Even less, they ha... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-28-2017, 10:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat and maskprocessor piping ?
Post: RE: hashcat and maskprocessor piping ?
| there are plans to harmonize the brute-force syntax in all hashcat derivates. in other words, you will not need maskprocessor nor pipe anything into hashcat to run mask attacks with hashcat. i am stil... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
7,899 |
03-07-2012, 02:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: sha1(sha1($pass) confused.
Post: RE: sha1(sha1($pass) confused.
| That's simple, the -m 300 uses the binary digest from the first sha1() as input for the 2nd sha1() while -m 4500 uses the ascii hex representation of the first sha1(). |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
7,898 |
12-21-2013, 05:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: sha1(sha1($pass) confused.
Post: RE: sha1(sha1($pass) confused.
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
7,898 |
12-22-2013, 02:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: bug？？？
Post: RE: bug？？？
| Please create a ticket in the ticket tracker: https://hashcat.net/trac |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,896 |
01-17-2013, 12:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice DES S-boxes with LOP3.LUT instructions
Post: RE: Bitslice DES S-boxes with LOP3.LUT instruction...
| Bitsliced DES makes sense with brute-force -a 3 mode. Otherwise the register pressure is too strong and your data gets swapped on global memory, making everything slower than it would be without bitsl... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,895 |
07-14-2016, 12:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice DES S-boxes with LOP3.LUT instructions
Post: RE: Bitslice DES S-boxes with LOP3.LUT instruction...
|
Quote:
--
My first impression is that a < 400 speed boost for 1 high end 3k+ core GPU versus 1 outdated CPU is pretty poor
--
There's no such general statement. I think your speed, if it includes ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,895 |
07-15-2016, 10:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice DES S-boxes with LOP3.LUT instructions
Post: RE: Bitslice DES S-boxes with LOP3.LUT instruction...
| No, it will be slower because of the register pressure |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,895 |
07-18-2016, 01:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA : print the BSSID as well ?
Post: RE: WPA : print the BSSID as well ?
| I can see the need for it, still it's a rare case. I will add it if there's some time left |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
7,892 |
05-27-2014, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hi new here and couple of ?'s
Post: RE: Hi new here and couple of ?'s
|
Tommie_c Wrote: (11-03-2010, 01:33 AM)
--
Always the noobs asking ?'s, right? LOL Here we go; Names Tommie C, 55, Vancouver B.C. been doing mostly JTR for a while, and see I recognize some of the fo... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
7,888 |
11-03-2010, 10:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it
Post: RE: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone tes...
| I've reproduced the case, it's actually slower. Thanks for reporting!
But no worries, I already found the reason and fixed it. The bitmaps were optimized to run faster on a different hashlist size ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,886 |
03-06-2015, 05:25 PM |
