|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: md5crypt
Post: RE: md5crypt
| no, md5crypt is 1000 times iterated md5 plus other obfuscation |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
7,704 |
03-14-2012, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why the .pot?
Post: RE: Why the .pot?
| The main reason for having a potfile in oclHashcat-plus is for --show and --left. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,703 |
05-03-2013, 07:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Exclude mask range
Post: RE: Exclude mask range
| A good question, I though a lot about this problem. ATM I don't see any practical solution, especially when it comes to fast hashes. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
7,698 |
03-24-2014, 05:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 10 digit mask increments
Post: RE: 10 digit mask increments
| in that case, use statsprocessor to visualize |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,695 |
02-03-2014, 01:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: A few requests
Post: RE: A few requests
|
K9_ Wrote: (04-04-2012, 06:38 PM)
--
[i] to display the info again.
I can't read the info after pressing the [s] button too many times :p
Hashes: X
Unique digests: X
Rules: X
GPU-Loops: X
... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
7,677 |
04-06-2012, 09:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
| I'm talking about the binary distribution inside the .7z archives. I'm wondering if we can drop those binaries for 32 bit. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-04-2016, 12:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
|
royce Wrote: (06-04-2016, 02:50 PM)
--
Suggestion: Separate them out into their own .7z archives.
That way, you can track whether anyone is downloading them. If no one is using them, you can drop... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
|
undeath Wrote: (06-04-2016, 07:23 PM)
--
Is there any sane reason to run hashcat on a non-64bit system? Other than failing to install the correct OS arch I mean.
--
There's some algorithm that can ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
| There's also the problem that there's no nvml.dll for 32 bit on Windows. That makes hardware management on NVidia a bit problematic, but users could misinterpret it and falsly assume hardware manageme... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.24 + 4 x hd5790
Post: oclHashcat v0.24 + 4 x hd5790
| good news: i just got a message from a oclHashcat user who successfully ran latest oclHashcat v0.24 with 4x hd5970 in parallel on linux (= 8x gpu). single hash md5 was around 17,5B/s, multihash agains... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
1 |
7,668 |
01-24-2011, 02:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't workout why my mask isn't working.
Post: RE: Can't workout why my mask isn't working.
| these ?1 are masks not rules. rules are something complete different.
https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack
https://hashcat.net/wiki/rule_based_attack |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,664 |
05-17-2012, 01:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
| Don't post errors if you use --force |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,656 |
08-28-2013, 12:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
| Right but the kernel was generated and cached and is now reused. Remove old *.kernel files in kernels/4098/ to make sure no old version using --force is used. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,656 |
08-28-2013, 12:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug or Question, not sure
Post: RE: Bug or Question, not sure
| indeed, the quoting on windows is a bit strange. i use a wrapper script for my runs to avoid dealing with escape chars in windows :) but it should not find more passwords when running it multiple time... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,653 |
03-29-2011, 10:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug or Question, not sure
Post: RE: Bug or Question, not sure
| i hardly tried to reproduce this but i cant. everything works fine, here is my log. maybe i did something wrong? could you please verify?
Quote:
--
atom@hashcat:~/hashcat-0.36$ cat > hash
047cc... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,653 |
03-29-2011, 01:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.19
Post: oclHashcat v0.19
| This is the first official update of oclHashcat.
A lot of changes have been made. Download it here: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/
* most important changes:
- New Feature: Change the kernel-... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
0 |
7,651 |
05-23-2010, 08:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark for bcrypt
Post: RE: Benchmark for bcrypt
| Well its for the reference: $2a$05$ |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,648 |
11-07-2012, 12:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: error exectuing in Ubuntu16.06
Post: RE: error exectuing in Ubuntu16.06
| Do you know what you're doing? -a 1 required 2 wordlists |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,643 |
11-09-2016, 11:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: error exectuing in Ubuntu16.06
Post: RE: error exectuing in Ubuntu16.06
| What is the password? Does it match the mask: ?a?a?a ? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,643 |
11-15-2016, 07:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom solution for MD5?
Post: RE: Custom solution for MD5?
| doesn't look untypical for me. it's the opposite, it looks more like a typical custom algorithm used in a php app or so. in this case its simply md5(salt1.md5(pass).salt2)? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,638 |
08-07-2014, 11:02 AM |
