Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Segmentation fault (core dumped) maybe an exploit
Post: RE: Segmentation fault (core dumped) maybe an expl...
Its a null-pointer derefence, no need to worry. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,008 |
12-22-2012, 11:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Build Machine
Post: RE: Build Machine
Some hashcat user tried, said it works fine |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
6 |
7,007 |
06-09-2016, 05:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat output file
Post: RE: Hashcat output file
You can not. Are you looking for a way to match the results with some other metadata? You might want to take a look at the --username parameter |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
7,002 |
03-22-2014, 08:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: what's the default mask of lite when cracking DES
Post: RE: what's the default mask of lite when cracking ...
with oclHashcat-lite v0.09:
Code:
--
-1 ?l?d?u
-2 ?l?d
-3 ?l?d*!$@_
?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3?d?d?d?d
--
with oclHashcat-lite v0.10 this changes to:
Code:
--
-1 ae10i2onrls938t45m67c... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,995 |
06-10-2012, 03:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: Trying to increase performance of mask attack with a two character prefix
Post: RE: Trying to increase performance of mask attack ...
The strategy to use -m 20 is the right one as -m 20 is around 10-100 times faster than -m 0 if the mask has a static prefix. The reason why this is not in your case is because your prefix is not entir... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
6,972 |
01-28-2018, 07:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Help please
Post: RE: Help please
You are missing the mask.
https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
6,967 |
08-22-2012, 10:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Source code
Post: RE: Source code
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
6,965 |
06-27-2010, 08:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20
Post: oclHashcat v0.20
Download it here: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/
* changes v0.19 -> v0.20:
Code:
--
type: improvement
file: oclHashcat
desc: added wordlist segmentation, allows wordlists to be of arbitrary... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
0 |
6,961 |
06-18-2010, 10:42 AM |
|
|
Thread: Can Hashcat work with MIT Kerberos passwords?
Post: RE: Can Hashcat work with MIT Kerberos passwords?
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,961 |
04-02-2011, 11:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - cracking wpa
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
currently working on that on the new wiki |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,960 |
10-10-2011, 12:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - cracking wpa
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
there it is: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=cracking_wpawpa2 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,960 |
10-24-2011, 12:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: Outfile interference
Post: RE: Outfile interference
infile (dictionary) is ok, but outfile can create problems. i would not recommend it. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
6,958 |
07-15-2012, 09:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: GLIBC Linking on Hashcat v0.48 vs v0.47?
Post: RE: GLIBC Linking on Hashcat v0.48 vs v0.47?
Will be fixed in hashcat v0.49 |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
6,953 |
01-02-2015, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: GLIBC Linking on Hashcat v0.48 vs v0.47?
Post: RE: GLIBC Linking on Hashcat v0.48 vs v0.47?
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
6,953 |
01-05-2015, 01:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: session management
Post: RE: session management
conito26 Wrote: (05-05-2010, 10:16 PM)
--
Hi
Launching a cracking operation whit hashcat might take several days to obtain the result
can a any member show me please how to set a resuming optio... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
6,947 |
05-06-2010, 09:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: Which hashcat should I install on my Windows XP 32bit?
Post: RE: Which hashcat should I install on my Windows X...
Which OpenCL compatible hardware do you want to run it on? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
6,947 |
12-18-2016, 05:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Which hashcat should I install on my Windows XP 32bit?
Post: RE: Which hashcat should I install on my Windows X...
I think Intels OpenCL runtime does not support that CPU. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
6,947 |
12-27-2016, 11:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
Post: RE: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
Both errors go back to some broken OpenCL installation |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,943 |
06-30-2016, 12:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
Post: RE: Cannot execute hashcat v3.00
Cool, thanks for reporting back |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,943 |
06-30-2016, 05:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.10 Slower?
59xx series is dead, even AMD dropped it from the drivers. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,943 |
02-13-2017, 11:57 PM |