|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Bit slow when starting?
Post: RE: Bit slow when starting?
| sounds like you are using a to small dictionary. try again with rockyou.txt |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,507 |
04-26-2012, 07:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bit slow when starting?
Post: RE: Bit slow when starting?
| no brief explanation, but if you want to get a bit deeper into how it works check this subsection: https://hashcat.net/wiki/oclhashcat_plus#dictionary_loading |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,507 |
04-27-2012, 05:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 2.01 vs 3.1
Post: RE: hashcat 2.01 vs 3.1
| You can try with --opencl-vector-width 1 or 2 or 4, see if it changes anything |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
5 |
6,505 |
11-09-2016, 11:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| Maybe the hashes which you're trying to crack were not created on a server using utf8 but some codepage/iso encoding. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-01-2017, 02:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| Hashcat uses binary loading of the wordlist, there's no functions used that somehow do a textual interpretation of the data (and automatically convert them). Therefore it makes absolute no sense what ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-02-2017, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| I don't know, I find this really hard to understand to what you said in the beginning:
Quote:
--
For some reasons I have to use hashcat on both The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-03-2017, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: I Need Your Help
Post: RE: I Need Your Help
| 1. remove crossfire hardware bridge.
2. uninstall sdk 2.5
3. remove catalyst 11.12 with its own uninstaller
4. remove remaining files with driver sweeper, especially opencl dlls
5. reinstall catalyst ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,496 |
01-14-2012, 09:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
| Exactly, but, empty string checks will be added in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,496 |
05-21-2012, 06:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 4 should append current word to the memory
Post: RE: 4 should append current word to the memory
| No its exactly working as I wanted it to and how I understood it. You sure you can not do what you want to this with this variant? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,495 |
01-04-2013, 11:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat exhausted, yet password is in dictionary
Post: RE: Hashcat exhausted, yet password is in dictiona...
| Typical WPA case and it's always because of a bad handshake capture. Just do a new one. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,495 |
12-18-2016, 11:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat exhausted, yet password is in dictionary
Post: RE: Hashcat exhausted, yet password is in dictiona...
| Latest hashcat beta adds some help for that, new feature. You can add as many handshakes as you want (to make sure there's at least one valid) while cracking them all at once takes the same time as a ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,495 |
12-22-2016, 02:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: problem with --runtime
Post: RE: problem with --runtime
| please wait for trac coming back and add a ticket then |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,493 |
02-09-2013, 06:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with STDIN
Post: RE: Problem with STDIN
| What you mean by not looking for a STDIN handle? If we want to read from it, it must be opened. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
6,491 |
10-22-2013, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 10 chars wpa password rule
Post: RE: 10 chars wpa password rule
| There's no tool to do out of the box what you want to do. But there's tools to do some of the rules you want.
1) Basic mask, use hashcat
2) Policy, use PACK
3) Repeats, use maskprocessor
4) No s... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
2 |
6,490 |
07-25-2016, 09:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
| Yeah, oclHashcat-plus 0.09 requires more RAM because of SHA512. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,485 |
07-03-2012, 09:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
| it would be easier to build hash-type specific memory segments than to load chunks, but that is something with not so high priority yet on my todo list |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,485 |
07-07-2012, 04:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.21
Post: oclHashcat v0.21
| Download it here: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/
* changes v0.20 -> v0.21:
Code:
--
type: improvement
file: kernels
desc: added -m 101 = sha1($pass.$salt)
type: improvement
file: kernel... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
0 |
6,484 |
06-24-2010, 09:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hccap file corrupted
Post: RE: Hccap file corrupted
| Yes, it uses wpaclean as it generally solves more problems as not using it |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,483 |
10-14-2014, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid attack and -s value
Post: RE: Hybrid attack and -s value
| in -a0 (with or without rules), -a1 and -a6 where the dictionary is used as base it's correct, I can confirm. Oh, there is an exception for oversized lines. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
6,482 |
02-25-2014, 07:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 does not crack hashes
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 does not crack hashes
| Please provide anything (hash, wordlist, commandline, etc) for devs to reproduce this and to ensure it's not a bug, but from 9 of 10 of those cases it's just an invalid OpenCL installation. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,482 |
07-27-2016, 11:05 AM |
