|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: PDF Hash
Post: RE: PDF Hash
| Wrong mode. For $pdf$2*3 use 10500 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
6,365 |
08-08-2018, 11:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: PDF Hash
Post: RE: PDF Hash
| On top of that, you may want to use the mask ?l?l?l?l?d?d?d?d and not ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
6,365 |
08-08-2018, 11:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: PDF Hash
Post: RE: PDF Hash
|
digidax Wrote: (08-08-2018, 11:44 AM)
--
What filter I have to use? I know the password lenght is between 9 and 10 chars.
Maybe it can be filtered sharper: one "%" is used, one "9" is used and the l... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
6,365 |
08-08-2018, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: PDF Hash
Post: RE: PDF Hash
| I cracked the hash accidentially. The password was reused in a hash in the linkedin dump. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
6,365 |
08-08-2018, 04:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.08 - problem with --pw-skip
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.08 - problem with --pw-skip
| see here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-681.html |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
1 |
6,364 |
11-26-2011, 03:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible descrypt performance issue
Post: RE: Possible descrypt performance issue
| It depends, sure there's a performance drop related to multihash because we can not know the salt value at compile time but as long as you use -a 3 the performance should be only a little bit slower. ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,359 |
01-12-2016, 02:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible descrypt performance issue
Post: RE: Possible descrypt performance issue
| Should be fixed with latest beta |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,359 |
01-14-2016, 11:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
| Hello Beta-Tester,
YAY! There it is!
type: feature
file: host programs
desc: added support for restore/resume
type: feature
file: host programs
desc: added support for sessions
Works w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,351 |
11-08-2012, 03:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
| https://paste2.org/p/2446751 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,351 |
11-08-2012, 04:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
| Preview from the upcoming release notes. hth.
[hr]
Support added for autotuning.
There is this magical -n parameter. I know you often use it, but you can also misuse it. You know the higher y... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,351 |
11-14-2012, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to obtain hash value from rar archive
Post: RE: How to obtain hash value from rar archive
| RAR-hp means it will only work if filenames etc are encrypted as well |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,349 |
10-23-2015, 08:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
Post: RE: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
| Rewrite it to get rid of the includes and we will think about it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
6,346 |
02-15-2017, 09:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux 32bit
Post: RE: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux ...
| its already fixed in beta |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,342 |
03-06-2013, 11:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux 32bit
Post: RE: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux ...
| I will release it once I've implemented NetNTLMv1 and NetNTLMv2 into oclHashcat-plus.
For a workaround you just need to switch to a 64 bit OS. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,342 |
03-07-2013, 01:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Comments on UNHash talk at 31c3
Post: Comments on UNHash talk at 31c3
| For those who haven't seen it, here's a link to the talk:
https://mirror.netcologne.de/CCC/congress/2014/h264-hd/31c3-5966-en-de-UNHash_-_Methods_for_better_password_cracking_hd.mp4
My comments o... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
6,342 |
12-30-2014, 01:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Gui windows dependencies
Post: RE: Hashcat Gui windows dependencies
| you are right. i have mentioned this on the download page. thanks. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
6,338 |
11-08-2011, 11:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
| Can't reproduce (tested with hd5770 + hd7970):
oclHashcat-plus:
Recovered....: 70/338 Digests, 22/184 Salts (1st run)
Recovered....: 70/338 Digests, 22/184 Salts (2nd run)
Recovered....: 70/338 Dig... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-30-2012, 10:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
| I was able to reproduce the bug after talking to blandy on IRC. b36 is up and should fix it. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-30-2012, 03:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
| OK, thanks for reporting again! Both issues should be fixed with b38 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-31-2012, 12:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How build it from source? [Windows7]
Post: RE: How build it from source? [Windows7]
| cuda is deprecated, hashcat 3.00 uses opencl for nvidia gpu |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
6,333 |
06-03-2016, 05:07 PM |
