hashcat Forum - Search Results

* Does the mask match the password? * Did you set the correct offset for full drive encryption? Is this one really the same as with TrueCrypt? * Are you sure the cipher is not cascaded?

atom

hashcat

5,675

12-03-2016, 02:47 PM

Thread: am I doing something wrong?
Post: RE: am I doing something wrong?

> but the guy on the site that i provided the link for uses -m 6241 insted of -m 13761 so This is correct for 6241 > maybe thats my issue, should I use 6241 ? Maybe, yes. I can't say for sure if ...

atom

hashcat

5,675

12-07-2016, 07:11 PM

Thread: am I doing something wrong?
Post: RE: am I doing something wrong?

But if hashcat can not find it, it's either an invalid offset or the mask is invalid. To find out which of them is true, I can only see one way. You need to build a bootable veracrypt system and repro...

atom

hashcat

5,675

12-09-2016, 01:52 PM

Thread: How to use mdxfind to remove hashes from word lists?
Post: RE: How to use mdxfind to remover hashes from work...

No clue, maybe ask on their forums?

atom

General Talk

5,674

07-24-2016, 03:30 PM

Thread: How to use mdxfind to remove hashes from word lists?
Post: RE: How to use mdxfind to remove hashes from word ...

Wait, why do you think such a "stupid question" is a non-stupid question if you ask it on this forum?

atom

General Talk

5,674

07-27-2016, 10:48 AM

Thread: Any tool to BF AES
Post: RE: Any tool to BF AES

That makes no sense, AES uses a fixed length key 128, 192 or 256. They can't have only use 6 chars. You sure there's no KDF in between?

atom

General Talk

5,673

09-12-2016, 12:19 AM

Thread: Any tool to BF AES
Post: RE: Any tool to BF AES

Well, if the KDF and then doing some AES, the correct way to crack it is doing exactly the same. You will crack it in not time with such a password policy. There's even no need to do it on GPU

atom

General Talk

5,673

09-14-2016, 02:38 PM

Thread: WPA2 handshake
Post: RE: WPA2 handshake

masterpiece

atom

hashcat

5,669

11-30-2016, 07:48 PM

Thread: ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 719
Post: RE: ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 719

Someone reported the same error with sha256 before. Please try again with oclHashcat v1.37 (will be released soon).

atom

Old oclHashcat Support

5,662

07-27-2015, 10:03 AM

Thread: Single rule doesn't work
Post: RE: Single rule doesn't work

both were indeed bugs, many thanks for reporting them. i already fixed them. if you're interessted in a beta for testing PM me. oclHashcat will not have a debug mode (its because word mutation is done...

atom

Old hashcat Support

5,655

02-03-2011, 10:33 AM

Thread: Can you run hashcat backwards?
Post: RE: Can you run hashcat backwards?

You can also use hashcats tools/test.pl in passthrough mode to generate them

atom

hashcat

5,655

12-25-2016, 03:41 PM

Thread: Debug Mode
Post: RE: Debug Mode

You mean which mask matches a password? That's like impossible to answer, because there's too many. Do you want to know which rule cracked a password? Use debug mode.

atom

hashcat

5,652

07-27-2016, 11:00 AM

Thread: Debug Mode
Post: RE: Debug Mode

Hashcat uses markov-chain optimizations. IOW, there's no Aaaaa9999 (or better said Zzzzz9999) as final word. If you just want the mask which was used to crack your hash, why don't you name the output ...

atom

hashcat

5,652

08-12-2016, 02:46 PM

Thread: sha-512 Drupal 7
Post: RE: sha-512 Drupal 7

will be supported with oclHashcat v1.20

atom

Old oclHashcat Support

5,651

04-14-2014, 01:53 PM

Thread: DES-ECB & optimization
Post: RE: DES-ECB & optimization

Using "-1 charsets/DES_full.charset --hex-charset ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1" is correct so far, because DES has only a 56 bit key, not 64 bit. To crack a DES Key you need to know the CryptText and the Plain...

atom

General Talk

5,645

10-25-2016, 11:41 AM

Thread: DES-ECB & optimization
Post: RE: DES-ECB & optimization

Because the K80 is crap

atom

General Talk

5,645

10-25-2016, 02:42 PM

Thread: Limitations of some functions in the rules ?
Post: RE: Limitations of some functions in the rules ?

use A for 10, B for 11, etc