|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: edit file ".restore"
Post: RE: edit file ".restore"
| Whats the problem, check the structure on wiki https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=oclhashcat#parsing_the_restore-file |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
5,452 |
05-14-2014, 06:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Legacy hardware won't cut it(HD 5970)
Post: RE: Legacy hardware won't cut it(HD 5970)
| That's the typical behaviour with the drivers. They often change the optimization settings in the JiT compiler. Sometimes the driver then optimizes something to the bad, so it becomes slower than if i... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
5,444 |
01-04-2018, 03:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-plus language?
Post: RE: hashcat-plus language?
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,442 |
10-01-2011, 01:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Crack TrueCrypt without keyfile
Post: RE: Crack TrueCrypt without keyfile
| Sorry, no chance yet to crack it using oclHashcat as it does not support keyfiles. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
5,432 |
01-07-2015, 11:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Not sure how to crack this
Post: RE: Not sure how to crack this
| Guess there's no way around to reverse the code on the CNC |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
5,432 |
04-27-2015, 01:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: M and Q rules in hashcat v3.10?
Post: RE: M and Q rules in hashcat v3.10?
| Hey, you couldn't know, the rules.txt wasn't updated. I've fixed that now. Take a look here:
https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/master/docs/rules.txt
It shows you which rules you can use wi... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,429 |
11-21-2016, 01:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: M and Q rules in hashcat v3.10?
Post: RE: M and Q rules in hashcat v3.10?
| > Is there some major hurdle to having "M" and "Q" be usable with -r?
> And will the memory rules ever be usable with -r?
Maybe, if it turns out to be important
> Edited: E.g., if I want to avo... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,429 |
11-24-2016, 09:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: M and Q rules in hashcat v3.10?
Post: RE: M and Q rules in hashcat v3.10?
| > Why have the unchanged word waste the time going throught ten thousand spins when it could be rejected and move on to the next input word?
Because there's no benefit in skipping it. The time it t... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,429 |
11-27-2016, 02:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fan Speed Control
Post: RE: Fan Speed Control
| You can disable gpu-temp-retain support, in that case it will not increase fan speeds |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,422 |
12-21-2013, 04:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax
Post: RE: Rule synatx
| you can use maskprocessor, multi-rules or hybrid attack. see wiki before asking |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,418 |
04-19-2012, 08:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: beginner question.. pls help! (:
Post: RE: beginner question.. pls help! (:
| The best way to crack this is combinator attack, you're on a good path. You need some good dictionaries that it can combine the word "Free" with the word "Burgers4U" which both are inside your diction... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
5,413 |
04-04-2012, 09:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: installing v.50 hashcat CPU The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) sana
Post: RE: installing v.50 hashcat CPU The-Distribution-W...
| It's not accessible publicly. If it's very important to you send me an email. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
5,410 |
11-10-2015, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Unknown salt
Post: RE: Unknown salt
| Create all possible variants using maskprocessor plus a leading ":" to file A, then use combinator.bin from hashcat-utils with your current hashlist and file A to merge them to create a large hashlist... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,396 |
05-21-2017, 01:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Unknown salt
Post: RE: Unknown salt
| It's your own fault if you do not export the salt, which is freely available in the database. If you intentionally make your life harder than necessary, that's what you get. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,396 |
05-22-2017, 08:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Unknown salt
Post: RE: Unknown salt
| The -e option was in hashcat legacy only |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,396 |
05-23-2017, 03:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b41
Post: b41
| b41 progress is going good, we're at around -m 3100 of the kernel ports.
also try out the new benchmark mode. simply run oclhashcat64 -b without any other stuff.
recommend driver is 13.9 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
5,390 |
11-06-2013, 04:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b41
Post: RE: b41
| thanks for the report.
all kernels are ported, b50 is up.
please, whoever can, post the same as KT819GM did. just run in -b mode |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
5,390 |
11-11-2013, 04:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: distribute crack
Post: RE: distribute crack
| it took a while to understand that these are two different questions.
Quote:
--
Command results：ERROR: to much combinations possible
--
96^10 = 66.483.263.599.150.104.576 combinations. regar... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
1 |
5,381 |
12-05-2011, 11:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Help understanding toggles and rules WPA
Post: RE: Help understanding toggles and rules WPA
| Rules is one way to do it. There's also the table-lookup attack which makes the processes easier, you don't have to write all the rules, just the translations.
Quote:
--
root@et:~/hashcat-0.50# ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,376 |
03-08-2015, 07:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: get hashcat-type/version over command
Post: RE: get hashcat-type/version over command
| We can't care about backward compatibility because GPU drivers and OpenCL runtimes don't do so either. Therefore there's only one solution: Update hashcat and eventually buy new hardware if you need t... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
5,376 |
01-26-2017, 10:04 AM |
