|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: which ubuntu version?
Post: RE: which ubuntu version?
| oclHashcat will supported all AMD driver 14.9, so you can selected the driver you want to use. It is compiled on ubuntu 15.04 so maybe not the worst idea to use it but I don't think that's a must |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
4,497 |
08-02-2015, 03:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Favorite Rules?
Post: RE: Favorite Rules?
| check out the new dive.rule. its huge, but its sorted by occurance. if you want it to be smaller, just head -XXX the ruleset. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,482 |
04-27-2015, 01:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat CPU vs GPU - Linux vs Windows
Post: RE: Hashcat CPU vs GPU - Linux vs Windows
| 1. Your GPU and CPU performance looks good, nothing to improve by compiling from source. If you want to compile from source on windows, read BUILD_msys.md or BUILD_cygwin.md you can find it on hashcat... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,482 |
04-05-2019, 04:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Stupid Question
Post: RE: Stupid Question
| Yes, the 2xhd6990 is faster, but not much:
1x hd7990 @ ntlm : 32986 MH/s
2x hd6990 @ ntlm : 39151 MH/s
But you save the pcie slot and the power consumption |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
1 |
4,471 |
03-27-2014, 10:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Max combination result
Post: RE: Max combination result
| Your calculation is incorrect because ?s = 33, not 95
52*26*26*26*26*33*33 = 25 877 636 928 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,467 |
06-02-2014, 11:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: how to find autotuned values?
Post: RE: how to find autotuned values?
| Compile hashcat with DEBUG=1, then it will show you in benchmark mode. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,450 |
08-13-2016, 01:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: how to find autotuned values?
Post: RE: how to find autotuned values?
| It's really easy compiling from source, try it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,450 |
08-14-2016, 08:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| Makes sense as you compare a desktop discrete gpu with a mobile one |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,440 |
03-07-2017, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v4.0.0 slow with itunes backup 14800
Post: RE: hashcat v4.0.0 slow with itunes backup 14800
| The solution is to use -w 4 (which enables all threads on the GPU) but has other disadvantages. So use it for -m 14800 only and for the other modes use -w 3. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
4,440 |
11-06-2017, 02:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v4.0.0 slow with itunes backup 14800
Post: RE: hashcat v4.0.0 slow with itunes backup 14800
| True @ password length, but for this change the reason was fine tuning. In general it's better to have a low number of threads, as long as it doesn't drop the performance. For NV the ideal OpenCL thre... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
4,440 |
11-07-2017, 11:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| Yeah the numbers of functions per rule have been increased to 15, but thats since long time already. I will fix wiki entry |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-22-2013, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SipHash format
Post: RE: SipHash format
| SipHash is something different, it's not SIP (MD5). I think that's where the confusion comes from.
SipHash: https://131002.net/siphash/ |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,432 |
10-23-2014, 10:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Writing hashfile.new takes too long time.
Post: RE: Writing hashfile.new takes too long time.
| Please do not use network-shares for your hashfile or do not use --remove. The potfile is the better alternative. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,429 |
09-14-2015, 11:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What means "1024/4096 MB allocatable"
Post: RE: What means "1024/4096 MB allocatable"
| OpenCL has a bit a strange policy on memory allocation:
Quote:
--
Max size of memory object allocation in bytes. The minimum value is max (1/4th of CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE, 128*1024*1024)
--... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
4,416 |
06-30-2016, 08:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat saying wrong driver
Post: RE: Hashcat saying wrong driver
| Also note, ROCm example app does not involve OpenCL. There's also clinfo which uses OpenCL. If that works and you can see your device then hashcat should work, too. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
4,415 |
12-16-2018, 11:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to Allocate More Memory?
Post: RE: How to Allocate More Memory?
| The OpenCL runtime limits hashcat to use only 1/4 of the total memory, but for memory intense algorithms like scrypt it allocates four blocks to workaround that problem. For other algorithms it doesn'... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
4,401 |
12-25-2016, 02:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: guess number
Post: RE: guess number
| Note that with hashcat such a guess number does not reflect the real guess numbers. There's huge blocks of guesses that are ran in parallel, which means from that number you can not tell if it was gue... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,395 |
03-17-2017, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: itunes backup >10 - am i doing it wrong?
Post: RE: itunes backup >10 - am i doing it wrong?
| No it's fine, iTunes backup >= 10.0 is doing 10,000,000 iterations of PBKDF2, so it's actually that slow. I meassured a single computation on CPU to run > 40 seconds. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
4,395 |
05-21-2017, 01:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3 seperator bug
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3 seperator bug
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
4,387 |
12-16-2012, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: cuModuleLoad 301 error with GTX 1080
Post: RE: cuModuleLoad 301 error with GTX 1080
| Is this a joke or what? Your own screenshot says it's v2.01 not v3.00. Use v3.00 and it will work |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,384 |
07-11-2016, 04:36 PM |
