|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
| I'm new user of hashcat. This software is very excellent! I love it so much!
Does hashcat support MSCHAP? As is known to all, MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2 is widely used on the internet, such as PPTP VPN, etc..... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,586 |
01-18-2016, 05:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP?
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 06:04 AM)
--
Mmm, Windows is not my strong suit, but MSCHAP is the same as NetNTLM, is it not?
--
Thanks a lot! I've tried MSCHAP using hash type 5500 (NetNTLMv1). It di... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,586 |
01-18-2016, 08:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP?
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 06:04 AM)
--
Mmm, Windows is not my strong suit, but MSCHAP is the same as NetNTLM, is it not?
--
Well, MSCHAP can be cracked by hash type 5500 (NetNTLMv1). It's very g... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,586 |
01-18-2016, 10:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 07:03 PM)
--
Can you not re-arrange the output of whatever program you're using to match oclHashcat's expected input format? There's already a thread about this at https:/... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,586 |
01-19-2016, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: About the performance in the homepage of oclHashcat
Post: About the performance in the homepage of oclHashca...
| I notice that, in the homepage of oclHashcat, there is the performance of some kind of GPUs. One of them is
"PC4: Ubuntu 14.04, 64 bit Catalyst 14.9 8x AMD R9 290X stock core clo... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
10,061 |
01-19-2016, 11:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: About the performance in the homepage of oclHashcat
Post: RE: About the performance in the homepage of oclHa...
|
stepMode Wrote: (01-19-2016, 12:29 PM)
--
Well if I remember correctly there are boards with more than 8 PCIe x16 slots although they require 2 CPUs to get full access to all lanes.
--
Do you know t... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
10,061 |
01-19-2016, 05:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: About the performance in the homepage of oclHashcat
Post: RE: About the performance in the homepage of oclHa...
|
wgmmmx Wrote: (01-19-2016, 12:54 PM)
--
halexan Wrote: (01-19-2016, 11:00 AM)
--
I notice that, in the homepage of oclHashcat, there is the performance of some kind of GPUs. One of them is
"PC4:... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
10,061 |
01-19-2016, 05:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: About the performance in the homepage of oclHashcat
Post: RE: About the performance in the homepage of oclHa...
|
stepMode Wrote: (01-26-2016, 04:53 PM)
--
there you go
https://www.supermicro.co.uk/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X10DRG-O_-CPU.cfm
Edit: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168131305... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
10,061 |
01-27-2016, 04:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: AMD R9 390x benchmark
| ASUS STRIX-R9 390X
Ubuntu 14.04
Crimson Edition 15.12
oclHashcat 2.01
Code:
--
Device #1: Hawaii, 7928MB, 1070Mhz, 44MCU
Hashtype: MD4
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 22799.0 MH/... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,559 |
01-29-2016, 02:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
|
jodler303 Wrote: (01-29-2016, 01:58 PM)
--
These values are without overclocking, right?
--
No overclocking! |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,559 |
02-01-2016, 08:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
|
wgmmmx Wrote: (01-29-2016, 02:55 PM)
--
Everything same like with R9 290x benchmark, only name change.
--
Yes, only a little improvment. 290x and 390x are almost the same! |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,559 |
02-01-2016, 08:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-29-2016, 09:23 PM)
--
Yes, this is the same card as the 290X, only not available in reference design.
No, this is not with stock clocks. You can see from the benchmark he's over... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,559 |
02-01-2016, 08:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
Post: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
| As we know, oclHashcat-2.10b134 already supported RAR5. Is there any tools to convert RAR5 to hashcat hash formats?
According to what I know, "rar2john" probably do not support RAR5. Am I right? |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,029 |
03-01-2016, 03:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
Post: RE: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
|
epixoip Wrote: (03-01-2016, 03:57 AM)
--
No that's incorrect, rar2john supports RAR5. The problem is, it is not a standalone utility. It is compiled into john. I've looked at breaking it out into a s... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,029 |
03-01-2016, 09:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Gpu advice
Post: RE: Gpu advice
|
user1002 Wrote: (02-18-2016, 10:59 AM)
--
Ok, can I run a 970 and a 7950 in that mobo at the same time to get even better cracking speed ? Will this work in oclHashcat because one of the pcie x16 slo... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
5 |
8,198 |
03-02-2016, 08:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat version 2.10, FPGA support?
Post: oclHashcat version 2.10, FPGA support?
| As atom said, oclHashcat v2.10 adds supports for FPGA. Does that mean that just run the OpenCL kernels on FPGA?
Running oclHashcat on such device?
https://xilinx.eetrend.com/files-eetrend-xilinx... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,627 |
03-16-2016, 03:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Version of oclHashcat is "v2.10 beta 192"
When cracking -m=5500 NetNTLMv1. The following results are extremely different!
Running benchmark, speed is 1218.2 MH/s.
Code:
--
./oclHashcat6... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,887 |
04-27-2016, 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 10:43 AM)
--
Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) a... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,887 |
04-27-2016, 11:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 11:32 AM)
--
Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU.
--
I just want to know why "v2.10" using word list in straight mode leads to a big speed dr... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,887 |
04-27-2016, 04:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| I still don't understand. Why there is a big performance difference between brute-force and straight mode?
brute-force 1200Mh/s, using wordlist 4500kh/s
Is there any method to narrow the gap? |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,887 |
05-03-2016, 05:49 AM |
