|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP?
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 06:04 AM)
--
Mmm, Windows is not my strong suit, but MSCHAP is the same as NetNTLM, is it not?
--
Well, MSCHAP can be cracked by hash type 5500 (NetNTLMv1). It's very g... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,592 |
01-18-2016, 10:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 07:03 PM)
--
Can you not re-arrange the output of whatever program you're using to match oclHashcat's expected input format? There's already a thread about this at https:/... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,592 |
01-19-2016, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
Post: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
| As we know, oclHashcat-2.10b134 already supported RAR5. Is there any tools to convert RAR5 to hashcat hash formats?
According to what I know, "rar2john" probably do not support RAR5. Am I right? |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,032 |
03-01-2016, 03:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
Post: RE: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
|
epixoip Wrote: (03-01-2016, 03:57 AM)
--
No that's incorrect, rar2john supports RAR5. The problem is, it is not a standalone utility. It is compiled into john. I've looked at breaking it out into a s... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,032 |
03-01-2016, 09:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Version of oclHashcat is "v2.10 beta 192"
When cracking -m=5500 NetNTLMv1. The following results are extremely different!
Running benchmark, speed is 1218.2 MH/s.
Code:
--
./oclHashcat6... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,894 |
04-27-2016, 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 10:43 AM)
--
Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) a... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,894 |
04-27-2016, 11:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| I still don't understand. Why there is a big performance difference between brute-force and straight mode?
brute-force 1200Mh/s, using wordlist 4500kh/s
Is there any method to narrow the gap? |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,894 |
05-03-2016, 05:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 11:32 AM)
--
Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU.
--
I just want to know why "v2.10" using word list in straight mode leads to a big speed dr... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,894 |
04-27-2016, 04:36 PM |
