|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
|
jodler303 Wrote: (01-29-2016, 01:58 PM)
--
These values are without overclocking, right?
--
No overclocking! |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,566 |
02-01-2016, 08:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
|
wgmmmx Wrote: (01-29-2016, 02:55 PM)
--
Everything same like with R9 290x benchmark, only name change.
--
Yes, only a little improvment. 290x and 390x are almost the same! |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,566 |
02-01-2016, 08:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-29-2016, 09:23 PM)
--
Yes, this is the same card as the 290X, only not available in reference design.
No, this is not with stock clocks. You can see from the benchmark he's over... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,566 |
02-01-2016, 08:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Version of oclHashcat is "v2.10 beta 192"
When cracking -m=5500 NetNTLMv1. The following results are extremely different!
Running benchmark, speed is 1218.2 MH/s.
Code:
--
./oclHashcat6... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
04-27-2016, 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 10:43 AM)
--
Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) a... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
04-27-2016, 11:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| I still don't understand. Why there is a big performance difference between brute-force and straight mode?
brute-force 1200Mh/s, using wordlist 4500kh/s
Is there any method to narrow the gap? |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
05-03-2016, 05:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 11:32 AM)
--
Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU.
--
I just want to know why "v2.10" using word list in straight mode leads to a big speed dr... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
04-27-2016, 04:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD RX480 performance?
Post: RE: AMD RX480 performance?
|
Quote:
--
Hashtype: RAR3-hp
Speed.Dev.#1.: 4168.5 kH/s (60.24ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.: 3710.9 kH/s (74.10ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.: 7879.4 kH/s
--
Is RAR3-hp cracking speed right? I remember Titan... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
18 |
38,795 |
07-01-2016, 10:20 AM |
