Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP?
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 06:04 AM)
--
Mmm, Windows is not my strong suit, but MSCHAP is the same as NetNTLM, is it not?
--
Thanks a lot! I've tried MSCHAP using hash type 5500 (NetNTLMv1). It di... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,592 |
01-18-2016, 08:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP?
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 06:04 AM)
--
Mmm, Windows is not my strong suit, but MSCHAP is the same as NetNTLM, is it not?
--
Well, MSCHAP can be cracked by hash type 5500 (NetNTLMv1). It's very g... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,592 |
01-18-2016, 10:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
Post: RE: How about RAR5 to hashcat?
epixoip Wrote: (03-01-2016, 03:57 AM)
--
No that's incorrect, rar2john supports RAR5. The problem is, it is not a standalone utility. It is compiled into john. I've looked at breaking it out into a s... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,032 |
03-01-2016, 09:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat FPGA support
Post: RE: oclHashcat FPGA support
kiara Wrote: (06-28-2016, 04:35 PM)
--
their a german company https://www.sciengines.com/which are doing some cracking with FPGA
https://prntscr.com/bm5net
ur welcom
--
Due to the mechanism of AES... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
6 |
16,553 |
06-29-2016, 02:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat FPGA support
Post: RE: oclHashcat FPGA support
The algorithms can be pipelined on FPGA are very fast, such as DES. This kind of crack is much faster than GPU.
However, if a alogorithm can not be pipelined, such as SHA, its speed is much slower ... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
6 |
16,553 |
06-28-2016, 02:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 10:43 AM)
--
Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) a... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,894 |
04-27-2016, 11:17 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 11:32 AM)
--
Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU.
--
I just want to know why "v2.10" using word list in straight mode leads to a big speed dr... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,894 |
04-27-2016, 04:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
I still don't understand. Why there is a big performance difference between brute-force and straight mode?
brute-force 1200Mh/s, using wordlist 4500kh/s
Is there any method to narrow the gap? |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,894 |
05-03-2016, 05:49 AM |