Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
Post: RE: How about MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2?
epixoip Wrote: (01-18-2016, 07:03 PM)
--
Can you not re-arrange the output of whatever program you're using to match oclHashcat's expected input format? There's already a thread about this at https:/... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,592 |
01-19-2016, 10:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Version of oclHashcat is "v2.10 beta 192"
When cracking -m=5500 NetNTLMv1. The following results are extremely different!
Running benchmark, speed is 1218.2 MH/s.
Code:
--
./oclHashcat6... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
04-27-2016, 10:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 10:43 AM)
--
Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) a... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
04-27-2016, 11:17 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
I still don't understand. Why there is a big performance difference between brute-force and straight mode?
brute-force 1200Mh/s, using wordlist 4500kh/s
Is there any method to narrow the gap? |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
05-03-2016, 05:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
atom Wrote: (04-27-2016, 11:32 AM)
--
Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU.
--
I just want to know why "v2.10" using word list in straight mode leads to a big speed dr... |
|
halexan |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,896 |
04-27-2016, 04:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat FPGA support
Post: RE: oclHashcat FPGA support
kiara Wrote: (06-28-2016, 04:35 PM)
--
their a german company https://www.sciengines.com/which are doing some cracking with FPGA
https://prntscr.com/bm5net
ur welcom
--
Due to the mechanism of AES... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
6 |
16,553 |
06-29-2016, 02:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat FPGA support
Post: RE: oclHashcat FPGA support
The algorithms can be pipelined on FPGA are very fast, such as DES. This kind of crack is much faster than GPU.
However, if a alogorithm can not be pipelined, such as SHA, its speed is much slower ... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
6 |
16,553 |
06-28-2016, 02:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD RX480 performance?
Post: RE: AMD RX480 performance?
Quote:
--
Hashtype: RAR3-hp
Speed.Dev.#1.: 4168.5 kH/s (60.24ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.: 3710.9 kH/s (74.10ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.: 7879.4 kH/s
--
Is RAR3-hp cracking speed right? I remember Titan... |
|
halexan |
Hardware
|
18 |
38,795 |
07-01-2016, 10:20 AM |