|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Can't get ocl working as hashcat
Post: Can't get ocl working as hashcat
| Hi,
I am using hashcat for a while, and I thank you guys for this wonderful code.
I am trying to get Oclhashcat working on my cuda.
Actually my hashcat command line is
Code:
--
hashcat-cli.exe ... |
|
pyr |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
10,270 |
11-30-2010, 10:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Merge tools ?
Post: Merge tools ?
| Hi,
I have a question..
- I actually use hashcat to crack hashes wiht my CPUs, gives me about ~14M hashes/sec.
- I use oclHashcat on my Cuda nvidia geforce 8400 too. About 15M hashes /sec.
Why can't... |
|
pyr |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
11,999 |
09-15-2010, 08:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: oclhash question about length
| Hi,
Maybe a stupid question, but, as written in the oclhashcat documentation :
Code:
--
Charset: 0123456789
Length: 8
oclHashcat.exe hashes.txt -m 0 -o res.txt ?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d
--
If I nee... |
|
pyr |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,510 |
12-12-2010, 09:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Merge tools ?
Post: RE: Merge tools ?
| OK thanks.
So the better way to use CPU + GPU is to launch each tool in parallel ? |
|
pyr |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
11,999 |
09-15-2010, 07:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| Thank you for your answers.
It works better with 4 at left you're right.
Another question :
the mask ?d?d?d?d will crack only password of 4 digits isn't it ?
According to my test it will not cr... |
|
pyr |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,510 |
12-14-2010, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| Nice feature.
Can you please confirm that this command
Code:
--
oclHashcat.exe hashes.txt -m 0 --increment ?d ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d
--
will try length from 2 (?d ?d) to 10 ?
But with this, I'm ... |
|
pyr |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,510 |
12-14-2010, 10:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| Hi,
During this night I tried with 10 hashes from length 1 to 10 :
Code:
--
oclHashcat.exe hash.txt -m 0 ?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d?d
--
It only cracks 2 hashes : the one with length 6 and the one with l... |
|
pyr |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,510 |
12-15-2010, 09:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| Exact, it works fine !
So if I well understand you, this code
Code:
--
oclHashcat.exe hashes.txt -m 0 ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d --increment
--
will try length from 8 to 11 ? |
|
pyr |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,510 |
12-16-2010, 10:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed / Performance Comparison
Post: RE: Speed / Performance Comparison
|
Quote:
--
Activating quick-digest mode for single-hash
--
Means there is a kind of special algo to deal with single hash. So it's not multihash anymore ? |
|
pyr |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
12,167 |
09-15-2010, 08:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed / Performance Comparison
Post: RE: Speed / Performance Comparison
| Ok.
So why it is slower than an other tool ? |
|
pyr |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
12,167 |
09-15-2010, 07:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed / Performance Comparison
Post: Speed / Performance Comparison
| Hi,
Thanks for your work.
You say on the home page "Fastest cpu-based multihash cracker", but when I tried it with this command :
Code:
--
hashcat-cli.exe -n 2 -m 1000 -a 3 --bf-pw-min=1 --b... |
|
pyr |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
12,167 |
09-14-2010, 10:09 PM |
