Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
|
|
Thread: Question about masks
Post: RE: Question about masks
orionz Wrote: (01-10-2015, 04:49 PM)
--
I think I answered this myself, 36^8=2821109907456
In this case does the second mask implies that I have letter-number-letter-number... ?
--
Correct. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,911 |
01-10-2015, 08:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: Octofire?
Post: RE: Octofire?
Are you able to keep temperature in a reasonable range with your cooling setting, finally? |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
12 |
19,268 |
01-19-2015, 02:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: One of six GPUs has 99% Util and 0 H/s, Progress gets stuck at 99%
Post: RE: One of six GPUs has 99% Util and 0 H/s, Progre...
Try oclhashcat v1.32 and see if it still occur. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
18,055 |
01-20-2015, 04:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: permutation patterns
Post: RE: permutation patterns
No, there are not that many permutations. Ok, it still going to be slow because of WPA but it's easily feasible. Just take an english dictionary like oxford, filter the 5 letter words (let's call tha... |
|
mastercracker |
General Talk
|
5 |
12,658 |
01-21-2015, 04:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: permutation patterns
Post: RE: permutation patterns
Apparently, I greatly underestimated the number of 5 letter words in english. I thought that there would be something like 1000 of them which would have made a dictionary around 13 Gb. Then your bes... |
|
mastercracker |
General Talk
|
5 |
12,658 |
01-23-2015, 04:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
Post: RE: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
Maybe there is something that I don't understand but why do you use --hex-charset? |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,996 |
04-14-2015, 01:44 AM |
|
|
Thread: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
Post: RE: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
wgmmmx Wrote: (04-14-2015, 09:13 AM)
--
Becouse salt and hash are in hex
--hex-charset Assume charset is given in hex ... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,996 |
04-14-2015, 10:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: No output file
Post: RE: No output file
It should be in your cudahashcat folder. Because you selected --outfile-format=2, it will look like a wordlist (only plains are saved). Also, your cracked hashes will be in cudahashcat.pot file. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,704 |
04-14-2015, 09:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
I would like to participate but don't really have the time. I will give it a shot if I have some spare time when you run the contest. If you want to make it a bit more challenging, you can make the... |
|
mastercracker |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,152 |
04-14-2015, 10:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
I suggest that you stay polite too. How about you give us your command line so that we can see what could potentially be wrong. Also "is not work" and "it did'nt work for me" are quite vague. Did y... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,342 |
04-15-2015, 04:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: No output file
Post: RE: No output file
Try to reformat your command line this way just in case:
cudahashcat hash file
The parameters after the mask might get ignored. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,704 |
04-16-2015, 10:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: No output file
Post: RE: No output file
Yes, that's what I meant. To be safe, I always put all the switches/options (starting with - or --) between the program (cudahashcat, oclhashcat, hashcat-cli...) and the target (usually an hash file).... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,704 |
04-17-2015, 01:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: When bruteforcing
Post: RE: When bruteforcing
These values are speed so it all depends on the algorithm and the number of hashes. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,116 |
04-17-2015, 01:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: When bruteforcing
Post: RE: When bruteforcing
True, I forgot to mention workload. You can add some rules to your attack and if the speed increases then it's likely that the workload was not enough to use your GPUs at their full potential (and ac... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,116 |
04-17-2015, 04:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: Odd Bruteforce Issue
Post: RE: Odd Bruteforce Issue
He did not use the --remove switch so yeah, they always gonna be there... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,496 |
04-18-2015, 06:40 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ordering Dictionarys
Post: RE: Ordering Dictionarys
Just a couple of suggestions:
- You can keep the original wordlist in one folder if you want but you should have a folder where all the wordlist have unique entries. For example, this means that t... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,239 |
04-18-2015, 06:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: Odd Bruteforce Issue
Post: RE: Odd Bruteforce Issue
epixoip Wrote: (04-18-2015, 09:41 AM)
--
@mastercracker: no, hashcat supports potfiles now, and he specifically stated that "it finds x number of hashes in the pot file", referring to the "INFO: remo... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,496 |
04-18-2015, 03:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: Brute-force missing characters from a known word?
Post: RE: Brute-force missing characters from a known wo...
Your approach is what undeath was suggesting. I think that your conclusion is right too. The problem is likely to be the ?k so you have to find the proper way to escape it. I don't have an answer t... |
|
mastercracker |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
8,738 |
04-18-2015, 04:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Brute-force missing characters from a known word?
Post: RE: Brute-force missing characters from a known wo...
Here's the solution:
Code:
--
An exception is if we want the static letter ? itself, which must be written as ??.
--
Command line:
Code:
--
hashcat-cli64.exe -a 3 -m 6900 --pw-min=47 --pw-max=47 ... |
|
mastercracker |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
8,738 |
04-18-2015, 05:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Speeding up hashcat mac osx
Post: RE: Speeding up hashcat mac osx
The algos you are trying to crack are slow even on GPU so you are probably already at the fastest setting. Your best bet is to try to crack the Joomla it's not as slow as the 3 others that you mentio... |
|
mastercracker |
General Help
|
2 |
5,670 |
04-18-2015, 06:47 PM |