Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
|
|
Thread: Quickie on how OclHashcat+ works
Post: Quickie on how OclHashcat+ works
Hi. I would like to know if cl: 8 in oclhashcat+ means that 1 password of length 8 is being processed or a group of passwords of length 8 is processed? If it is the latter, how many? Thanks. |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
7,996 |
02-01-2011, 10:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: [split] OclHashcat+ and --remove
Boris has a point. In the case where you want to start many attacks in a batch file (.bat), removing every possible cracked hash would save time on the subsequent attacks of the batch. If possible, ... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-02-2011, 06:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
Post: RE: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
I was able to reproduce the same problem by also putting extreme values:
-n 216 --gpu-loops 512
got the error cuCtxPopCurrent() 999
My cards in this case were a GTX260 and a GTS250.
Now an... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
23,291 |
02-02-2011, 11:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Help for crack SHA1 salt:password
Post: RE: Help for crack SHA1 salt:password
estefano Wrote: (02-03-2011, 07:58 PM)
--
Hi :
im want to crack sha1 (salt:pass) whit you program, im have win7 64 bits and 1xHD5970 (im supose whit this program oclHashcat+ v0.03 can crack it) vi... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
21,788 |
02-03-2011, 08:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
atom Wrote: (02-04-2011, 10:57 AM)
--
what the problem using hashcat to do the --remove work?
--
That would mean that you have to actually be physically there once every attack finish to remove them.... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-05-2011, 08:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
K9_ Wrote: (02-05-2011, 11:01 AM)
--
I would place a simple command in the batch file.
Code:
--
hashcat.exe -a 0 -m 0 --remove yourhashlist.txt foundpasswords.txt
--
--
I did not know about that ... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-05-2011, 03:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
This will be a problem with MD5(unix) hashes that don`t always have the same length... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-09-2011, 04:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: ATI cards on Windows
Post: ATI cards on Windows
I consider buying some ATI card because they are cheaper for the speed on the OCLhashcat's programs. One of the drawback (in Windows) is to have every card plugged to a monitor. Is there any workaro... |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
5 |
15,018 |
02-11-2011, 06:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: ATI cards on Windows
Post: RE: ATI cards on Windows
Rolf Wrote: (02-11-2011, 07:19 AM)
--
There are dummy plugs.
Idk if they're being sold, but they can be made.
Check here (https://forums.bit-tech.net/showthread.php?p=1985272) and here (https://forum... |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
5 |
15,018 |
02-11-2011, 05:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Hi. I ran the following attack on about 2 million hashes:
cudahashcat+32.exe -d 1,2 -m 0 -o found2.txt -r "C:\rules\basic.txt" test.hash "F:\Dictionaries\Dict\All.txt"
Rules:
Code:
--
:
r
d... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-11-2011, 05:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
Post: RE: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
I think that having at least all the unsalted algos in OCLhashcat+ would be a good complement because it greatly simplifies dictionary and hybrid dictionary (applying rules) attacks. Of course, as al... |
|
mastercracker |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
17,322 |
02-12-2011, 09:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
atom Wrote: (02-15-2011, 03:58 PM)
--
any news here?
--
I assumed that you were correct and did not do anything further but just to make sure that we are not missing something out, I will do it tomor... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-16-2011, 03:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Oops. Looks like a problem here's the -output-format=2
4144e195f46de78a3623da7364d04f11:a:61
93b885adfe0da089cdf634904fd59f71::
dd1c7ceb4c92653a696b7907a4dd4df1:C:43
13757e0fb71915e385efa4dc9d1... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-17-2011, 06:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
atom Wrote: (01-27-2011, 10:50 AM)
--
32 byte salt is not supported since v0.24. max 31 byte.
--
I had not realized about that change. If it is solely a question of performance, I'd rather have lowe... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
02-19-2011, 11:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Just in case Atom missed it, the problem is existant. From what I noticed, it seems to crack a password but sometime then assign it to the wrong hash. For all the wrong Hash:Password pair, the passw... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-23-2011, 07:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhc+ bug?
Post: RE: oclhc+ bug?
acubens Wrote: (02-25-2011, 01:15 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (02-25-2011, 12:42 PM)
--
everything is fine! not a bug. both oclhc and oclhc+ just can not crack hashes with plain of length >= 16
--
Thanks I... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,261 |
02-26-2011, 05:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Replicated the problem with mode 1000... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-26-2011, 05:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
atom Wrote: (02-26-2011, 09:36 AM)
--
that was a good hint mastercracker. i found somthing. it is exactly as i said in the beginning. it is salted with a null-byte. or better said its the unicode ver... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-27-2011, 03:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 and rules file
Post: RE: SHA1 and rules file
qetup Wrote: (03-14-2011, 12:47 AM)
--
so according to
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-294.html
SHA1 support for oclhashcat+ is forthcoming.
and from what i have read, oclhashcat doesn't suppo... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
6,679 |
03-14-2011, 06:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26b
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26b
I finally got to do a little bit of my own testing and I am getting those values on a single GTX470, single hash:
-1 ?s?d?u?l
?1?1?1?1?1: 12.8M p/s
?1?1?1?1?1?1: 444.9M p/s
?1?1?1?1?1?1?1: 147... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
15 |
43,750 |
03-25-2011, 05:31 PM |