|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Nead help whit command
Post: RE: Nead help whit command
| Edit your .bat file or create a new one containing only what's left to do except for the one that crashed. For that one (should be the first line of your bat file), you put:
oclHashcat-lite64 --re... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
31,586 |
04-05-2012, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: motherboard for 3 GPU?
Post: RE: motherboard for 3 GPU?
|
forumhero Wrote: (04-04-2012, 01:18 AM)
--
looking for recommendations on a motherboard that have sufficient spacing between cards so that they don't choke each other.
saw this EVGA Z68 SLI 130-S... |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
15 |
46,431 |
04-04-2012, 02:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Title Rule
Post: RE: Title Rule
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (03-28-2012, 03:25 PM)
--
Hi atom
I can see that you kindly added this feature after all. Unfortunately I am unable to make it work on my set up.
I see here (https://hashcat.net... |
|
mastercracker |
General Help
|
9 |
22,712 |
03-28-2012, 03:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
| The quick answer is probably that since the mode 1400 don't use salts, the salt file does not get loaded and used. As for a solution for this, you could try oclHashcat-plus with rules that prepend or... |
|
mastercracker |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,806 |
02-21-2012, 03:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Question
Post: RE: Simple Question
| I still have one of my computer that is 32 bit. If you would decide to go without 32 bit and have the time bomb on previous version, that would be pretty bad. |
|
mastercracker |
User Contributions
|
8 |
15,451 |
02-21-2012, 03:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OSX hash
Post: RE: OSX hash
| You don't get the same hash because you don't use the salt. |
|
mastercracker |
General Help
|
4 |
8,739 |
02-15-2012, 07:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: .htpasswd crack ?
Post: RE: .htpasswd crack ?
| Yes and either remove the username from your hashlist or use the --username switch. |
|
mastercracker |
General Help
|
3 |
32,068 |
02-15-2012, 03:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Weird problem with -m 400
Post: RE: Weird problem with -m 400
| By the way, version 0.08 seems to have fixed the problem. |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,877 |
02-13-2012, 04:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Weird problem with -m 400
Post: RE: Weird problem with -m 400
|
atom Wrote: (01-21-2012, 09:54 AM)
--
rejects are usually the result of incomaptible words in the dictionary. if the whole dictionary is rejected its mostly because of a bad newline seperator. for ex... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,877 |
02-13-2012, 03:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| Ok. I have added the 2 ideas in the Awaiting implementation section of the Wiki. |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-10-2012, 08:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-09-2012, 06:59 PM)
--
OK! check out the new oclHashcat-plus beta in /beta. I have implented it that way. It is writing the cracked halfes to outfile/screen AND to hashcat.pot and you ... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-10-2012, 03:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: standard vga graphic
Post: RE: standard vga graphic
|
Esra Wrote: (02-09-2012, 03:27 PM)
--
ok
I buy a new xp server and its card is AMD and i install "Catalyst Drivers 11.12" for updating driver but i get this error : ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
----... |
|
mastercracker |
General Help
|
7 |
13,934 |
02-09-2012, 03:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-09-2012, 10:45 AM)
--
dont like the way how lm is done in lite, plus will be different. suggestions are welcome
--
This is just a brainstorming session to start some ideas. Again, I ... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-09-2012, 03:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-08-2012, 04:42 PM)
--
i need something to reproduce, otherwise i cant fix it (if there is anything to fix).
yes, ?u will be translated into ?l and if both exists, it will get "merg... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-08-2012, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| I have double-checked on my GPU. It seems that attacks with uppercase and numbers work fine. It gave a problem with a password containing a ! at the end. Here was my command line:
Code:
--
Cuda... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-08-2012, 04:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
| To add to what chort said, it's also possible to do it with Oclhashcat-plus if you use dictionary + rules. You have bugs as a dictionary, use a first rule file to add the 00, 01, 02, etc, a second ru... |
|
mastercracker |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
02-07-2012, 07:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-07-2012, 10:03 AM)
--
what chort says is correct, however oclHashcat-lite uses --increment mode by default. Even if his mask is set to 8x?l, it will start with 1x?l and iterate throug... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-07-2012, 05:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
|
atom Wrote: (02-04-2012, 09:20 PM)
--
mastercracker: plus will do that
--
Thanks, that answers also my question in the featured request section.
|
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements
|
16 |
56,856 |
02-04-2012, 09:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
atom Wrote: (02-01-2012, 11:27 PM)
--
LM will be added next version! :)
--
Will it be in the OCLhashcat-plus version as well? It would benefit people with multi-hash because one by one on the -lite ... |
|
mastercracker |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-04-2012, 09:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
|
Mem5 Wrote: (02-04-2012, 11:41 AM)
--
otherwise how can we know which part of the hash has been cracked when you have thousands of hashes ?..
--
There are multiple ways that it can be represented. O... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements
|
16 |
56,856 |
02-04-2012, 09:15 PM |
