Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
Post: RE: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
Just in case, can you post both the command line that you use. |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
11,348 |
06-22-2012, 09:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
Post: RE: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
It's probably not the problem but you could remove uncertainties by being precise in your command line. For your MD5 example, include the --hash-type 0 and put your hash in a text file instead of put... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
11,348 |
06-25-2012, 08:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hybrid Mask + Dict in HC-Plus v0.09b
Post: RE: Hybrid Mask + Dict in HC-Plus v0.09b
Ok, the v0.09 is not in the beta section anymore but in v 0.08 I get the same problem as Hash-it. Mode 7 don't seem to work with heavily iterated algorithm like Wordpress, phpbb3, MD5(apr), etc. It ... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
15 |
14,571 |
07-18-2012, 07:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
I get the exact same bugs with the GTX460 under the same conditions except that for the DCC bug with length 8 after the cuSynchronize, the password don't make it to the output file. |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-04-2012, 02:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
Again, I get the exact same bug on a Windows Vista 32 bit system with a GTS250 GPU and driver 301.42. |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-04-2012, 11:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
Unless newer versions of MyBB changed their hashing scheme, it was typically always with a 8 character salt using mixalphanum charset (no symbols). IPB have a 5 character salt using mixalphanum and s... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-05-2012, 08:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: My bugs for v0.09b41
BUgs for v0.09b41 with 301.42 on GTX470 GPU under Windows 7 64 bit.
Briefly, I have designed a series of test that covers most hash types and attack-modes with 5 different password lengths (2,4,8,1... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-04-2012, 06:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
BUgs for v0.09b41 with catalyst 12.6 on HD5750 GPU under Windows 7 64 bit.
I decided to put it in a different thread since it's a different bug pattern than CUDA cards and it might be followed by d... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-06-2012, 03:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
atom Wrote: (08-06-2012, 02:08 PM)
--
did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested?
--
No. Are we supposed to do that? I just decompressed the archive after download and p... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-06-2012, 07:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: About the crashes
Ok. I am also doing things to pinpoint the source of the crash on AMD. It seems to somehow be related to the mask or the amount of memory used by the mask. The password to crack was P0$7:
oclhashca... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-11-2012, 05:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
For -m 131, I confirm that hash generation was the main source of the problem. There are still bugs however that I will report on the thread of v44.
For -m 2100, I figured out the bug for the length... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-12-2012, 03:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
atom Wrote: (08-12-2012, 06:42 PM)
--
mastercracker, are you testing on single hash or multihash? its two different kernels
--
All the testings are on multihash only. To be more precise, all the ha... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-12-2012, 07:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
Here's my third system results (only differences with my GTX470):
System: Windows Vista 32 bit, Driver 301.42 GTS250, oclhashcat-plus beta 44
- For -m 1800 sha512crypt, SHA512(Unix), I get driver cr... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-13-2012, 05:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
For the test-plus.pl, some of the perl modules are a pain to install when you don't know how to do it properly (I learned the hard way what is the easy way). To be able to install some of the modules... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-07-2012, 04:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
Quote:
--
This is very confusing. The single mode require 1 or 2 parameters, but not 3? what are you trying to do?
--
What's the command line then? I state "single", tells what hash type I want with... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 04:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
atom Wrote: (08-09-2012, 11:12 AM)
--
There is a new BETA version up, please retry everything. I did several changes. The BUG with the PROMPT still exists, I will fix this later
--
Ok. I know that w... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-11-2012, 02:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: GTX470 v45
For the last post, I have added a not corrected bug for -m 132 that I skipped by mistake. For the GTX470, I get exactly the same result except that the -m 3000 is fine. I will quickly re-test the GT... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 02:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post 2:
New
- For -m 0 MD5, bruteforce of lenght 2,4 and 8 failed.
- For -m 120 sha1($salt.$pass), bruteforce (-a 3) fails on all length.
- For -m 121 SMF > v1.1, bruteforce (-a 3) fails on al... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-11-2012, 03:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
atom Wrote: (08-10-2012, 11:37 AM)
--
Can not reproduce:
Quote:
--
- For -m 130 sha1(unicode($pass).$salt), attack mode 1 and 7 fails. Mode 0,3 and 6 works perfectly well.
- For -m 132 MSSQL(2... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-11-2012, 03:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: current v44 status
System: Windows 7 64 bit, catalyst 12.6 HD5750, oclhashcat-plus beta 44
Initial setup:
I am testing 5 different length of passwords (2,4,8,12,15) on attack mode 0,1,3,6 and 7. All that for each alg... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-12-2012, 04:01 AM |