|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
| Here's a new one. On a large dictionary (1 Gb) and a couple of rules (100):
ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 999 |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
27 |
24,850 |
11-18-2012, 06:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
|
atom Wrote: (11-18-2012, 11:33 AM)
--
mastercracker Wrote: (11-18-2012, 04:18 AM)
--
atom Wrote: (11-17-2012, 10:16 AM)
--
Yeah its what to expect. If there is no workload left to share some GPUs w... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
27 |
24,850 |
11-20-2012, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
| Hi Atom. I have tried the 0.09 version on the following machine:
Windows Vista 32 bit, driver 306.02, GTS250
I get the ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 only on -a 3 (all the other modes are fine). It was a... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,486 |
09-09-2012, 04:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: RE: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
|
atom Wrote: (09-09-2012, 08:07 AM)
--
Try to find the kernel cache from NVidia on Windows, delete them and try again.
--
You lost me here. I don't know anything beside the kernels that are in the -p... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,486 |
09-09-2012, 08:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: RE: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
|
atom Wrote: (10-04-2012, 01:13 PM)
--
cuModuleLoad() 209 is totally different to cuModuleLoad() 301
thread stealer?
--
Original post was about the 209 so no thread stealing here. I cannot persona... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,486 |
10-04-2012, 03:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: RE: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
|
rolter09 Wrote: (10-04-2012, 03:18 PM)
--
so what can i do to fix the error? :(
--
If you have the beta driver 306.02, I would change for the WHQL driver 306.23. If that's the one that you have then... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,486 |
10-04-2012, 03:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: RE: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
| What is your OS (including 32 bit or 64 bit) and the graphic card that you are using? |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,486 |
10-12-2012, 08:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: RE: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
|
rolter09 Wrote: (10-13-2012, 08:58 PM)
--
Windows 7 32bit and gtx260
--
So if I summarize everything, the bug happens only for -a 3 and under windows 32 bit version. Does do it for a certain algorit... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,486 |
10-15-2012, 03:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: RE: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
|
rolter09 Wrote: (10-16-2012, 12:06 PM)
--
so far
-a 3 bug
-a 100 bug
-a 2600 ok
-a 300 ok
--
Can you repost it, please. -a 3 is ok but all the other -a does not exist. The reverse is true i... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,486 |
10-16-2012, 02:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| Also, the speed you are getting for the "Strange" examples are not accurate because you are already finished the attacks (100%). In your normal example, you are far from the end. |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-04-2013, 06:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| Just a tip to improve performance. When you want to do a combination attack that uses a small dictionary as the starting one, convert that dictionary to prepending rules (don't forget to reverse the ... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-08-2013, 06:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| Atom, this is a real bug. I never been able to restore my sessions because of the same error message. Works for single GPU but not with multi-gpu. Just in case it's related, notice this that was in... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-08-2013, 08:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Full testing on Nvidia with my GTX460 was flawless. I just realized the inclusion of -j and -k. This is good news. I will have to think on how to exploit it properly in my attack scheme. I might b... |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,633 |
09-05-2012, 07:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-07-2012, 10:03 AM)
--
what chort says is correct, however oclHashcat-lite uses --increment mode by default. Even if his mask is set to 8x?l, it will start with 1x?l and iterate throug... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-07-2012, 05:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-08-2012, 04:42 PM)
--
i need something to reproduce, otherwise i cant fix it (if there is anything to fix).
yes, ?u will be translated into ?l and if both exists, it will get "merg... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-08-2012, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| Ok. I have added the 2 ideas in the Awaiting implementation section of the Wiki. |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-10-2012, 08:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| I have double-checked on my GPU. It seems that attacks with uppercase and numbers work fine. It gave a problem with a password containing a ! at the end. Here was my command line:
Code:
--
Cuda... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-08-2012, 04:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-09-2012, 10:45 AM)
--
dont like the way how lm is done in lite, plus will be different. suggestions are welcome
--
This is just a brainstorming session to start some ideas. Again, I ... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-09-2012, 03:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom Wrote: (02-09-2012, 06:59 PM)
--
OK! check out the new oclHashcat-plus beta in /beta. I have implented it that way. It is writing the cracked halfes to outfile/screen AND to hashcat.pot and you ... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,297 |
02-10-2012, 03:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| Hi. Is anyone able to run Hashcat on windows XP? I have a computer that I would like to use Hashcat with but it runs on Windows XP pro SP3. I know the obvious solution would be to upgrade the OS bu... |
|
mastercracker |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,095 |
01-03-2013, 04:41 PM |
