Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
Post: RE: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
Which versions of OclHashcat are you referring to? Maybe a difference in the default workload tuning (-n and -u)? |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
17,914 |
09-03-2013, 05:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
Post: RE: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
There are a couple of things to consider. First, is your GPUs all at 99% when you do your tests? Also for the main explanation of the possible differences, read the announcement for v0.15. It's all... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
17,914 |
09-03-2013, 07:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
Post: RE: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
atom Wrote: (09-03-2013, 07:47 PM)
--
Make sure to read the release notes. You need to prepare your dictionaries
--
I was going to write that. There are many advantages of using 0.15 but it's your c... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
17,914 |
09-03-2013, 07:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: New version of HD 7970
Post: RE: New version of HD 7970
Kuci Wrote: (07-12-2013, 12:55 AM)
--
Look at here guys what I have found: https://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/356066
I have already pre ordered one and I hope oclHashcat will support it in next relea... |
|
mastercracker |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,401 |
07-15-2013, 06:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: No device marked hashcat 0.09
Post: RE: No device marked hashcat 0.09
siilens Wrote: (10-08-2012, 04:18 PM)
--
nope, in previous windows it had worked perfect!!!
--
This seems to suggest that you changed something else. Maybe have you updated the drivers but did not g... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
3 |
8,510 |
10-09-2012, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: No GPU utilization
Post: RE: No GPU utilization
tinman Wrote: (12-03-2012, 01:56 AM)
--
On my use of the rule d3ad0ne the hardware 1 still shows 0%. It seems to only report and use one of my two graphics cards. They are both 5770's and have cros... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
21,067 |
12-04-2012, 01:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: No output file
Post: RE: No output file
It should be in your cudahashcat folder. Because you selected --outfile-format=2, it will look like a wordlist (only plains are saved). Also, your cracked hashes will be in cudahashcat.pot file. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,706 |
04-14-2015, 09:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: No output file
Post: RE: No output file
Try to reformat your command line this way just in case:
cudahashcat hash file
The parameters after the mask might get ignored. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,706 |
04-16-2015, 10:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: No output file
Post: RE: No output file
Yes, that's what I meant. To be safe, I always put all the switches/options (starting with - or --) between the program (cudahashcat, oclhashcat, hashcat-cli...) and the target (usually an hash file).... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,706 |
04-17-2015, 01:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: No output pls help
Post: RE: No output pls help
If you press "s" during the run and it show 0/xxxx besides the recovered line, it simply means that you don't crack any of them with your wordlists. It would be a good idea to also specify what kind ... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,155 |
04-08-2014, 02:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: No password in outfile?
Post: RE: No password in outfile?
If the pass is q1w2e3r4t5 only then use the following command line to crack it:
$ ./cudaHashcat64.bin -m 102 --hex-salt testhash/hash.txt -1 ?s?d?u?l testhash/pass.txt ?1 --rule-left="]" --outfile-... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,664 |
09-09-2011, 03:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Noob Question
Post: RE: Noob Question
9970 = 7990?
Quote:
--
I want to add 8 to this barebone. Until here no problem,
--
If they are 7990s, they have 2 GPUs each. I might be wrong but double-check that the bios will be O.K. with handl... |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
5 |
11,905 |
08-15-2013, 05:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: NOOB question regarding NTLM Hashes
Post: RE: NOOB question regarding NTLM Hashes
Quote:
--
user:0000:#D##########D####D#DD#D####DDD##:##D##D#DDD###D##D#D###D##D#DD##D:
--
This is the only part that you need:
user:0000:#D##########D####D#DD#D####DDD##:##D##D#DDD###D##D#D###D##D#D... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,192 |
11-13-2013, 10:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Not making progress [Bug?]
Post: RE: Not making progress [Bug?]
I can reproduce this on b19 with oclhashcat and cudahashcat both on windows7 64 bit. |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,874 |
11-18-2013, 09:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: Not sure about the stats WPA/WPA2
Post: RE: Not sure about the stats WPA/WPA2
All the values from stdin were rejected before getting processed for the WPA algo because they were less than 8 characters. That's why it might look faster but it won't be faster than using the -a 3 ... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
9,401 |
02-13-2014, 07:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM and Line Length
Post: RE: NTLM and Line Length
Chinchilla Wrote: (06-13-2013, 07:06 PM)
--
1. Without a username, there will be no trace-ability.
2. The hashed password is relatively simple, 'Passphrase' and it is not cracking even though it i... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
41,191 |
06-13-2013, 07:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM hash, how practical is it?
Post: RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it?
ToJ Wrote: (02-22-2014, 01:49 PM)
--
When I run -m 1000 the mask is set to ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3 and my 8-char test-pwd isn't caught. How can I make sure that ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a is tested? (I know, but I ex... |
|
mastercracker |
General Help
|
12 |
21,943 |
02-23-2014, 05:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: NTLM Issues
Post: RE: NTLM Issues
polarbear Wrote: (09-01-2011, 07:23 PM)
--
I posted this in the oclHashcat-lite section also but I'm not sure if it was the right section.
I've tried to crack a NTLM hash but it hasnt been working... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
11,862 |
09-03-2011, 01:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: NTLMV2 hash crack bruteforce
Post: RE: NTLMV2 hash crack bruteforce
Look at the NTLMV2 format with the hash example from this page:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes
Also, it would be a lot cleaner if you would store your hash in a text file ins... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
47,758 |
01-29-2014, 07:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: NTLMV2 hash crack bruteforce
Post: RE: NTLMV2 hash crack bruteforce
Does Cain or JTR accept this hash as is? If so, does it really state that it's NTLMV2? I never worked with these format so I can't really help more than this. |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
47,758 |
01-31-2014, 12:28 AM |