|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Can I get this workload to use four gpus?
Post: RE: Can I get this workload to use four gpus?
| Just start one instance per GPU using one word each like:
Code:
--
./cudaHashcat64.bin -d 1 -a 3 -m 11600 -o wedidit.txt --session=one -w 3 -i outfile.hash word1?a?a?a?a
...
./cudaHashcat64.bin -d 4... |
|
mastercracker |
General Help
|
1 |
3,396 |
08-03-2015, 03:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Building a new beast
Post: RE: Building a new beast
|
It_security Wrote: (09-22-2011, 04:02 AM)
--
While hunting around I saw a wiki on bitcoin mining. I know its not what we are doing but working hashes with GPU's are basicaly the same right? Can I u... |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
11 |
23,789 |
09-27-2011, 04:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Build specs - another request
Post: RE: Build specs - another request
| I would be worried about the third (lowest) PCI-E slot. When fitted into the case, the motherboard often is at the very bottom of it leaving no room for a double-slot video card. |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
5 |
11,867 |
12-05-2013, 07:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Build specs - another request
Post: RE: Build specs - another request
| What you want is a 3 slot card which has is lowest PCI-E slot higher than the bottom of the card (if it exists) or take a 4-slot card and not use the bottom one like this one:
ASRock Z87 OC Formula L... |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
5 |
11,867 |
12-05-2013, 07:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Build Spec Review
Post: RE: Build Spec Review
|
epixoip Wrote: (11-26-2013, 10:06 PM)
--
^ this. three or four 7970s will do well with it though. but you need to make sure that case can handle four 7970s with the UD7. most can't.
--
Good point, mo... |
|
mastercracker |
Hardware
|
13 |
23,979 |
11-27-2013, 06:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bugs
Post: RE: Bugs
| There is a bug to the bug track. I just created one ticket but my name does not show up as the "owner" of the ticket. |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,654 |
01-16-2013, 04:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bugs
Post: RE: Bugs
| Ok, but will there be feedback about if it's going to get fixed or not? Do we have to submit both in the forum and in the trac? |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,654 |
01-17-2013, 03:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug2
Post: RE: Bug2
| Yes, that solved the problem. I think that it's not even the first time that I report such a problem with the same answer. Hopefully, I will remember it next time... Sorry for the useless post. |
|
mastercracker |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
3,877 |
08-22-2013, 02:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
|
atom Wrote: (09-20-2012, 08:00 PM)
--
What is the exact filename of the kernel it loads?
--
Since they all failed for dictionary attacks, I looked at those but if you need them for all -a then let me... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,575 |
09-21-2012, 07:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
|
atom Wrote: (09-21-2012, 09:50 AM)
--
923.1 is an very old catalyst, it should be 938.2. They are known not to work. You need 12.8 its the reason.
You may need driversweeper
--
Thanks. That helps... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,575 |
09-21-2012, 02:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
|
atom Wrote: (09-22-2012, 11:21 AM)
--
try driversweeper
--
Ok. I have fixed manually my problem by doing the followings. I am not sure that all the steps are required but it worked:
1) Delete fold... |
|
mastercracker |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,575 |
09-22-2012, 06:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
Post: RE: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
| Maybe there is something that I don't understand but why do you use --hex-charset? |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,996 |
04-14-2015, 01:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
Post: RE: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
|
wgmmmx Wrote: (04-14-2015, 09:13 AM)
--
Becouse salt and hash are in hex
--hex-charset Assume charset is given in hex ... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,996 |
04-14-2015, 10:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
Post: RE: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
| I am not sure that I understand everything but I have a couple of suggestions:
1)
Quote:
--
Pass is in plain_hex mean 0digit0digit
--
Why don't you set up a mask like that instead (without using --... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,996 |
04-22-2015, 11:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
Post: RE: bug in v1.31 to v1.35 on brutforce ?
|
Quote:
--
I use -1 ?d where ?d are digits 0123456789 I see this on wiki this is not correct ?
--
Let's say that you want to crack the password "pass1234" and you only know that the password starts b... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
9,996 |
04-23-2015, 11:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
Post: RE: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
| At one point, I did switch one of my computers to Windows 10. However, I ran into a weird problem that made me revert back to Windows 7: the CMD prompt would not work at all. It opens and close rig... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
15,453 |
08-28-2015, 03:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforcing a salt possible?
Post: RE: Bruteforcing a salt possible?
| It depends on the salt length, I guess. If it's a short salt, you try can bruteforce it but I don't understand why you want to do that. If you have bad intentions, normally all users have unique sal... |
|
mastercracker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,892 |
06-13-2015, 03:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute-force SHA1 not accepting command
Post: RE: Brute-force SHA1 not accepting command
| You have 2 choices. Either you use --hash-mode 100 and put the 3807744839 in your mask (which is missing from your command line) or you put Hash:3807744839 and use --hash-mode 120 (still you need a ... |
|
mastercracker |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
12,526 |
03-07-2013, 08:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute-force missing characters from a known word?
Post: RE: Brute-force missing characters from a known wo...
| Your approach is what undeath was suggesting. I think that your conclusion is right too. The problem is likely to be the ?k so you have to find the proper way to escape it. I don't have an answer t... |
|
mastercracker |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
8,739 |
04-18-2015, 04:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute-force missing characters from a known word?
Post: RE: Brute-force missing characters from a known wo...
| Here's the solution:
Code:
--
An exception is if we want the static letter ? itself, which must be written as ??.
--
Command line:
Code:
--
hashcat-cli64.exe -a 3 -m 6900 --pw-min=47 --pw-max=47 ... |
|
mastercracker |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
8,739 |
04-18-2015, 05:15 PM |
