|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Not a single percent of progress : (
Post: RE: Not a single percent of progress : (
|
blandyuk Wrote: (01-11-2013, 12:36 AM)
--
Based that your running this on a laptop, I doubt you'll get any faster. Your GPU only has 80 Stream Processors compared to say a Radeon 5870 which has 1600 ... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
18,789 |
01-11-2013, 02:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (01-09-2013, 01:31 PM)
--
epixoip Wrote: (01-09-2013, 02:13 AM)
--
precisely. what that table really demonstrates is the likeliness of a long password being cracked with current metho... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,742 |
01-09-2013, 05:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Should I replace the GPU for Dell Precision M4700?
Post: RE: Should I replace the GPU for Dell Precision M4...
| Dont use a laptop. If you dont have a choice but to use a laptop, try to get a mobile 7000 series. |
|
radix |
Hardware
|
5 |
13,934 |
01-09-2013, 05:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "Seperator unmatched"
Post: RE: "Seperator unmatched"
| Take a week to read the rules. |
|
radix |
General Help
|
3 |
10,391 |
01-09-2013, 05:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA/WPA2 in hashcat
Post: RE: WPA/WPA2 in hashcat
| Why, it would incredibly slow |
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
13 |
32,540 |
01-09-2013, 05:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
| a -3 seems to be ignoring everything after the first mask position as well |
|
radix |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-09-2013, 09:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom hash derived from DES encrypted pass
Post: RE: Custom hash derived from DES encrypted pass
| So you have a password, that was encrypted with DES, then hashed with SHA1 right? So sha(des($pass)). No, by default hashcat doesn't support this. If you want to continue, you will need to first re... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
10,846 |
01-09-2013, 09:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Sha1(user:pass) decryption
Post: RE: Sha1(user:pass) decryption
| Cool, now take a week to read the forum rules. |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,889 |
01-07-2013, 08:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
|
radix |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-05-2013, 10:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
|
Code:
--
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --gpu-loops 1024 -n 800 test -a 3 -1 ?l?d?s?u?h?F?R?D --force
Session.Name...: oclHashcat-plus
Status.........: Aborted
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 02:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat throws an unhandled exception error
Post: RE: hashcat throws an unhandled exception error
| This has been fixed. It seems a workaround for XP was accidentally removed at v0.41.
Forgot to mention this was fixed for .43 beta. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,965 |
01-05-2013, 10:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
Post: RE: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
| My telepathic powers are down this week, can you post the errors? |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
10,859 |
01-04-2013, 10:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| VM crashes as well. Immediately after start. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,095 |
01-04-2013, 04:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Linux & GPL
Post: RE: Linux & GPL
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
7,549 |
01-04-2013, 04:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OSX 10.8 Mountain Lion support
Post: RE: OSX 10.8 Mountain Lion support
| it's on the todo list already |
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
16,598 |
01-04-2013, 04:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| It should be, there were no compiler changes. Let me load up a VM and see if I can reproduce. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,095 |
01-03-2013, 04:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
|
usernome Wrote: (01-03-2013, 03:48 PM)
--
you think you are honest man, every one think like this for himself. i don't wanna steal work of atom, i ask for payed version and you say No we are whitehac... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 04:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
|
usernome Wrote: (01-03-2013, 02:37 PM)
--
yes i'm admin of network that include in security professionals? i'm little hacker wow. if i know to root my phone and some linux command that means i'm prof... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 03:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
|
usernome Wrote: (01-03-2013, 01:17 PM)
--
almost every one make money with oclhash, i will not bruteforce password for free, because i pay electricity.
if you invest 6000e in gpus you will brute... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 01:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
| You guys are all missing the fundamental point. Atom brought you this software for free. There was ZERO cost to you. The only thing that he asked was that you respect the rules. Those rules were l... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 01:08 PM |
