Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
Good riddance, damned cancer on this community. |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-01-2013, 06:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
k, hex charset is fixed, let me see if i can unfuck the |
|
radix |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-01-2013, 07:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: help need on hashcat cpu sha1 and sha256
Post: RE: help need on hashcat cpu sha1 and sha256
There is a bug with -a 3 and --hex-salt. It's being worked on already. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
5,450 |
01-02-2013, 06:33 AM |
|
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
mobile_spot Wrote: (01-02-2013, 02:38 PM)
--
Mr Atom....
Plzzzzz U are Thinking All that matter as wrong way...
Only One person made patch & post,,, What was our Fault ?
If a person post,,, no bod... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-02-2013, 10:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
You guys are all missing the fundamental point. Atom brought you this software for free. There was ZERO cost to you. The only thing that he asked was that you respect the rules. Those rules were l... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 01:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
usernome Wrote: (01-03-2013, 01:17 PM)
--
almost every one make money with oclhash, i will not bruteforce password for free, because i pay electricity.
if you invest 6000e in gpus you will brute... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 01:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
usernome Wrote: (01-03-2013, 02:37 PM)
--
yes i'm admin of network that include in security professionals? i'm little hacker wow. if i know to root my phone and some linux command that means i'm prof... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 03:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
usernome Wrote: (01-03-2013, 03:48 PM)
--
you think you are honest man, every one think like this for himself. i don't wanna steal work of atom, i ask for payed version and you say No we are whitehac... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,556 |
01-03-2013, 04:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
It should be, there were no compiler changes. Let me load up a VM and see if I can reproduce. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
01-03-2013, 04:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: OSX 10.8 Mountain Lion support
Post: RE: OSX 10.8 Mountain Lion support
it's on the todo list already |
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
16,598 |
01-04-2013, 04:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: Linux & GPL
Post: RE: Linux & GPL
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
7,549 |
01-04-2013, 04:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
VM crashes as well. Immediately after start. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
01-04-2013, 04:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
Post: RE: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
My telepathic powers are down this week, can you post the errors? |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
10,859 |
01-04-2013, 10:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat throws an unhandled exception error
Post: RE: hashcat throws an unhandled exception error
This has been fixed. It seems a workaround for XP was accidentally removed at v0.41.
Forgot to mention this was fixed for .43 beta. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,965 |
01-05-2013, 10:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Code:
--
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --gpu-loops 1024 -n 800 test -a 3 -1 ?l?d?s?u?h?F?R?D --force
Session.Name...: oclHashcat-plus
Status.........: Aborted
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 02:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
|
radix |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-05-2013, 10:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Sha1(user:pass) decryption
Post: RE: Sha1(user:pass) decryption
Cool, now take a week to read the forum rules. |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,889 |
01-07-2013, 08:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Custom hash derived from DES encrypted pass
Post: RE: Custom hash derived from DES encrypted pass
So you have a password, that was encrypted with DES, then hashed with SHA1 right? So sha(des($pass)). No, by default hashcat doesn't support this. If you want to continue, you will need to first re... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
10,846 |
01-09-2013, 09:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
a -3 seems to be ignoring everything after the first mask position as well |
|
radix |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-09-2013, 09:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: WPA/WPA2 in hashcat
Post: RE: WPA/WPA2 in hashcat
Why, it would incredibly slow |
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
13 |
32,540 |
01-09-2013, 05:09 PM |