|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: (kindof) Newbie questions (hardware, amazon ec...
| Its the fastest, I dont know about best.
Generally yes. You could distribute work across multiple systems with a few cards but it would require quite a bit of work. Also, standard rack mount chas... |
|
radix |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 03:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: (kindof) Newbie questions (hardware, amazon ec...
|
radix |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 03:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: (kindof) Newbie questions (hardware, amazon ec...
| Theres no way to estimate that because it depends on the length. If you knew the structure of each, you could get a ballpark of the maximum running time.
There have been places that have done it, ... |
|
radix |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 03:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
| Dont make new posts when the conversation can clearly be carried out in the OP. |
|
radix |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 07:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to run hashcat on a mac?
Post: RE: How to run hashcat on a mac?
| ./hashcat-cli64.app --help |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
42,978 |
03-10-2013, 10:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SQL 2012 password hash
Post: RE: SQL 2012 password hash
|
Code:
--
select pwdencrypt('Password1!')
0x0200F733058A07892C5CACE899768F89965F6BD1DED7955FE89E1C9A10E27849B0B213B5CE92CC9347ECCB34C3EFADAF2FD99BFFECD8D9150DD6AACB5D409A9D2652A4E0AF16
--
|
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
11 |
42,566 |
08-18-2012, 04:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SQL 2012 password hash
Post: RE: SQL 2012 password hash
| I've added this even though SQL documentation advises against using pwencrypt to hash passwords (bad admins will bad admin). Should be available in the next release of hashcat cpu. |
|
radix |
Feature Requests
|
11 |
42,566 |
08-21-2012, 11:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
|
squadx Wrote: (02-16-2013, 07:31 AM)
--
maybe I simply don't understand mask attacks, and don't see how they would benefit if it's soley a guaranteed 10 digit number
--
yeah then you don't understa... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,881 |
02-16-2013, 07:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Same command, different output?
Post: RE: Same command, different output?
| ocl has a character limit of 15 where cpu does not |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
21 |
41,748 |
12-16-2012, 03:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Same command, different output?
Post: RE: Same command, different output?
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
21 |
41,748 |
12-16-2012, 03:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Same command, different output?
Post: RE: Same command, different output?
| then whats the problem? GPU hashcat does not support the same length that cpu does, there is no way around that. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
21 |
41,748 |
12-16-2012, 03:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Same command, different output?
Post: RE: Same command, different output?
| thats assuming that the dictionaries are run in the exact same order which they arent, also notice that his GPU runs were completed but CPU was not. It would have found them, but the comparison is sk... |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
21 |
41,748 |
12-16-2012, 07:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Same command, different output?
Post: RE: Same command, different output?
| from ocl: Progress.....: 14344391/14344391 (100.00%)
from cpu: Progress..: 553093/553093 (100.00%)
CPU only ran 1/3 of the dict |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
21 |
41,748 |
12-17-2012, 11:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Same command, different output?
Post: RE: Same command, different output?
|
undeath Wrote: (12-17-2012, 08:03 PM)
--
radix Wrote: (12-17-2012, 11:25 AM)
--
CPU only ran 1/3 of the dict
--
as we all know cpu chunks the dict. see the full log. everything is fine.
--
fair ... |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
21 |
41,748 |
12-20-2012, 11:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
| If you have the money then yes, 290x is the better choice. I think the figure was 50% more for 35% more speed. |
|
radix |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,727 |
01-11-2014, 10:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM and Line Length
Post: RE: NTLM and Line Length
| Once you have recovered the pass you can use --username and --show to pair them back up with the username.
As for not finding the pass, verify that your dictionary does not have extra chars on the ... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
41,188 |
06-13-2013, 07:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM and Line Length
Post: RE: NTLM and Line Length
| gief me your ntlms pl0x
Chinchilla Wrote: (06-13-2013, 08:31 PM)
--
radix Wrote: (06-13-2013, 07:10 PM)
--
Once you have recovered the pass you can use --username and --show to pair them back up ... |
|
radix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
41,188 |
06-13-2013, 08:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashchat GUI?
Post: RE: Hashchat GUI?
|
Drivers Wrote: (01-06-2014, 09:50 PM)
--
Mem5 Wrote: (01-06-2014, 08:39 PM)
--
Drivers Wrote: (01-06-2014, 08:15 PM)
--
Quote:
--
ERROR: this copy of cudaHashcat-plus is outdated. Get a more rece... |
|
radix |
General Help
|
8 |
41,067 |
01-07-2014, 08:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Share your oclHashcat+ speeds
Post: RE: Share your oclHashcat+ speeds
| root@hashcat:/usr/local/oclHashcat+-0.03# ./cudaHashcat+64.bin '$1$ttZyaHgu$2VuH9BXN6KKJLp99ofMLy.' -m 500 -n 80 --gpu-loops 1000 -r rules/perfect.rule ../wordlists/rockyou.txt
cudaHashcat+ v0.03 sta... |
|
radix |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
16 |
40,989 |
02-04-2011, 01:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| It should be, there were no compiler changes. Let me load up a VM and see if I can reproduce. |
|
radix |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,095 |
01-03-2013, 04:48 PM |
