|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Steganos
Post: RE: Steganos
| I'm not familiar with Steganos, but some brief searching indicates that it's AES-256?
hashcat doesn't currently support trying to crack this. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,364 |
11-19-2017, 02:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Characters don't work on The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) LINUX Terminal
Post: RE: Characters don't work on The-Distribution-Whic...
| I'm not clear what your question is, though I would advise:
* Use a Linux distro other than K-a-l-i - its OpenCL integration needs work.
* Use the latest version of hashcat (3.30 is very outdated)... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,363 |
11-19-2017, 02:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: help with choosing the right options
Post: RE: help with choosing the right options
| * Reducing keyspace (such as limiting the number of possible specials) is often helpful, but the only way to tell is to calculate the difference and/or start the attack and see what the time estimate ... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,105 |
11-19-2017, 02:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Installation and upgrading problems
Post: RE: Installation and upgrading problems
| * You're much better off not using K a l i for hashcat. I have good luck with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
* Definitely use the latest hashcat directly from hashcat.net (currently 4.0.1).
* Use the steps... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,061 |
11-19-2017, 02:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Where is sha1(LinkedIn) ?
Post: RE: Where is sha1(LinkedIn) ?
| There are currently no plans to restore -m 190 in current mainline unified hashcat. If you need this hash type, you'll need to use the older releases of hashcat.
Also, those truncated hashes are f... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,810 |
11-19-2017, 02:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Decrypting usenet headers, part 2
Post: RE: Decrypting usenet headers, part 2
| I'm not familiar with that specific header, but - just speculating - it looks like a proprietary encoding/encryption scheme. When specific ecosystems (like Google) insert such public headers for their... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,140 |
11-19-2017, 02:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with scrypt
Post: RE: Problem with scrypt
| You might want try your attack against the example scrypt hash listed here:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes
... to validate your attack method. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,271 |
11-19-2017, 02:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: PKCS5S2 hash supported
Post: RE: PKCS5S2 hash supported
| This appears to be an Atlassian-specific hash?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26175391/how-to-match-crowd-database-passwords
hashcat doesn't currently support this hash type that I'm aware ... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,674 |
11-19-2017, 02:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: help me on how to create this hash
Post: RE: help me on how to create this hash
| This doesn't appear to be a hashcat-specific question. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,342 |
11-19-2017, 02:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Win10 hash
Post: RE: Win10 hash
| You might want to validate your setup and attack method using the corresponding example hash from:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,582 |
11-19-2017, 02:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat not working
Post: RE: Hashcat not working
| Are you still getting this error? It's very odd for "Device #1" to appear twice with the same number; could that be a typo? |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,242 |
11-19-2017, 02:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Sha224?
Post: RE: Sha224?
|
Code:
--
$ hashcat -V
v4.0.1
$ hashcat --help | egrep -i 'sha.*22'
1300 | SHA-224
--
|
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,456 |
11-19-2017, 02:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat speed
Post: RE: hashcat speed
| A number of changes and optimizations happened in the era of the hashcat versions that you're showing here.
How is performance for you using the latest (4.0.1 at this writing) and using -w 4 and -O... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
4,364 |
11-19-2017, 02:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.00 No CPU support
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.00 No CPU support
| Starting with the latest hashcat and a baseline config as described here may help:
https://hashcat.net/faq/wrongdriver |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,849 |
11-19-2017, 02:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: The Autotune Engine
Post: RE: The Autotune Engine
| Also linked to this post from the wiki here:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=autotune |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
2 |
10,698 |
11-19-2017, 03:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: clGetEventProfilingInfo(): error on EVGA 1080ti
Post: RE: clGetEventProfilingInfo(): error on EVGA 1080t...
| A well-rounded success story. Thanks for the update. :) |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,905 |
11-19-2017, 07:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v4.0.0
Post: RE: hashcat v4.0.0
| Fair question - though it's also the case that existing rules will now produce results that wouldn't have worked before.
In other words, if you run your existing rules and lists against your unfoun... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
11 |
86,633 |
11-20-2017, 06:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| To fully take advantage of GPU for a fast hash like MD5, you have to have more than a few rules.
You might try emulating a hybrid attack with generated rules.
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?i... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,530 |
11-22-2017, 04:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| Yeah, like I said in my edit - it doesn't work like I was hoping it would. I don't have a better answer yet.
But notice that what I was trying to do - generate some of the word on GPU with a large ... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,530 |
11-22-2017, 05:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 3.60 / hashcat 4.x many hashes
Post: RE: hashcat 3.60 / hashcat 4.x many hashes
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,473 |
11-22-2017, 05:45 AM |
