|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
| In the posted benchmarks, your GPU performance is roughly an order of magnitude better than your CPU performance. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-26-2017, 08:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
| You said your CPU was better than your GPU. This is not correct. Your GPU is much better. How much RAM you're using only matters when using large lists of rules, etc. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-27-2017, 02:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5: Need Advice
Post: RE: MD5: Need Advice
| Yeah, it sounds like you need a mode that I don't think hashcat currently supports:
md5(md5($salt).md5($pass))
You could then format your hashes as [hash]:[username], and use the username as the... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
20,787 |
05-12-2017, 01:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5: Need Advice
Post: RE: MD5: Need Advice
| I haven't tried it, but MDXfind might support it? It lists "MD5-MD5SALTMD5PASS". MDXfind supports CPU. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
20,787 |
05-12-2017, 02:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5: Need Advice
Post: RE: MD5: Need Advice
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
20,787 |
05-12-2017, 09:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
| Wow, this is going to be a game-changer!
If feasible, one UX request: Please do what JtR does here and warn the user about any "calculatable" efficiency thresholds into this new mode. For example, a ... |
|
royce |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-29-2020, 05:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
| "Association" is a general term here that allows attacks to be targets *on a per-hash basis*.
In other words, you don't have to try each word against each hash. Instead, you can try just one word ag... |
|
royce |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
10-01-2020, 05:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
atom Wrote: (09-30-2020, 12:11 PM)
--
Code:
--
The wordlist or mask that you are using is too small.
This means that hashcat cannot use the full parallel power of your device(s).
Unless you supp... |
|
royce |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 05:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| Not sure what the root cause is, but if you change the the OpenCL directory and run hashcat from there, it should work (in other words ../hashcat64.exe) |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,230 |
06-30-2016, 07:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
| That's ... a big wordlist. This isn't a direct answer to your question, but you might consider:
- Splitting your dictionary into multiple chunks, using the `split` command on Unix-likes
- If the w... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
07-10-2020, 01:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
| rli is for deduplication *across files* - see this example: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=hashcat_utils#rli
If you use 'split', you don't have to re-sort. Just use 'split' to take your exist... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
07-10-2020, 05:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
| My having explicitly said "This isn't a direct answer to your question" isn't exactly "completely ignoring" your question, yes?
The canonical solution to this problem is to not do what you're doing... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
07-10-2020, 03:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
| rli2 is definitely faster - once you've paid the initial cost of the sorting of the input files first. but it only takes one file to be removed as input.
there's also a new project 'rling' in progre... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
08-01-2020, 08:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
| The markov flag is unrealted to the dictionary.
I've used split -n l/3 in the past and it split properly. It's OK if the resulting files are not the same size, though they are usually close in my e... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
08-01-2020, 09:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
| I don't know what you mean by the first sentence. As for hashcat loading dictionary files one by one, what should it be doing instead? |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
08-06-2020, 05:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
| Splitting the wordlist into smaller chunks doesn't change the *total* load or attack time. It just distributes the dictionary load time into smaller chunks as well.
If this isn't helpful, please re... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
08-11-2020, 05:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,533 |
08-16-2020, 01:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: correct command line
Post: RE: correct command line
| Are you getting a specific error? Can you post the command line that you're trying? |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
24 |
22,564 |
10-05-2017, 05:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: correct command line
Post: RE: correct command line
| One-character parameters (single hyphen) don't work with equals signs, but multi-character (two hyphens) should work with equals signs.
Code:
--
$ echo blah | hashcat --hash-type=1000 --stdout
... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
24 |
22,564 |
12-25-2017, 08:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: +55 minutes in Generating Dictionary for 194GB
Post: RE: +55 minutes in Generating Dictionary for 194GB
| Have you looked into hashcat's rules and masks? You may be able to significantly reduced the size of your wordlist, in exchange for faster coverage of your likely password space.
For example, if your... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
26 |
24,602 |
03-19-2017, 06:54 AM |
