Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
My having explicitly said "This isn't a direct answer to your question" isn't exactly "completely ignoring" your question, yes?
The canonical solution to this problem is to not do what you're doing... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,532 |
07-10-2020, 03:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
rli2 is definitely faster - once you've paid the initial cost of the sorting of the input files first. but it only takes one file to be removed as input.
there's also a new project 'rling' in progre... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,532 |
08-01-2020, 08:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
The markov flag is unrealted to the dictionary.
I've used split -n l/3 in the past and it split properly. It's OK if the resulting files are not the same size, though they are usually close in my e... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,532 |
08-01-2020, 09:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
I don't know what you mean by the first sentence. As for hashcat loading dictionary files one by one, what should it be doing instead? |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,532 |
08-06-2020, 05:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Splitting the wordlist into smaller chunks doesn't change the *total* load or attack time. It just distributes the dictionary load time into smaller chunks as well.
If this isn't helpful, please re... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,532 |
08-11-2020, 05:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
Post: RE: Copy and reuse dictionary cache
|
royce |
hashcat
|
23 |
2,532 |
08-16-2020, 01:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
GPU is usually better.
There's no way to use more memory at the hashcat level. Some background on the 25% memory cap is here (https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/992502/cuda-programming-and-per... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-26-2017, 08:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
I don't know a lot about Mac hardware, but I would assume that this is because the GPU in that unit is slower than the CPU? In my experience, the GPU is usually better, though, so someone else may kno... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-26-2017, 08:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
That definitely works. Orient yourself with your command line.
Code:
--
$ hashcat -b -m 0
hashcat (v3.30-317-g778f568) starting in benchmark mode...
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
===... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-26-2017, 05:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
Also note that the "maximum power" you mentioned early is memory size, which has no relationship to speed. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-26-2017, 06:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
In the posted benchmarks, your GPU performance is roughly an order of magnitude better than your CPU performance. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-26-2017, 08:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
You said your CPU was better than your GPU. This is not correct. Your GPU is much better. How much RAM you're using only matters when using large lists of rules, etc. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-27-2017, 02:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: MD5: Need Advice
Post: RE: MD5: Need Advice
Yeah, it sounds like you need a mode that I don't think hashcat currently supports:
md5(md5($salt).md5($pass))
You could then format your hashes as [hash]:[username], and use the username as the... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
20,787 |
05-12-2017, 01:33 AM |
|
|
Thread: MD5: Need Advice
Post: RE: MD5: Need Advice
I haven't tried it, but MDXfind might support it? It lists "MD5-MD5SALTMD5PASS". MDXfind supports CPU. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
20,787 |
05-12-2017, 02:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: MD5: Need Advice
Post: RE: MD5: Need Advice
|
royce |
hashcat
|
21 |
20,787 |
05-12-2017, 09:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Wow, this is going to be a game-changer!
If feasible, one UX request: Please do what JtR does here and warn the user about any "calculatable" efficiency thresholds into this new mode. For example, a ... |
|
royce |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-29-2020, 05:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
"Association" is a general term here that allows attacks to be targets *on a per-hash basis*.
In other words, you don't have to try each word against each hash. Instead, you can try just one word ag... |
|
royce |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
10-01-2020, 05:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
atom Wrote: (09-30-2020, 12:11 PM)
--
Code:
--
The wordlist or mask that you are using is too small.
This means that hashcat cannot use the full parallel power of your device(s).
Unless you supp... |
|
royce |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,761 |
09-30-2020, 05:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask not finding password Straight hit or miss.
Post: RE: Mask not finding password Straight hit or miss...
Hi, Robert - could you please copy and paste the simplest, but complete, cmdline example and resulting output that demonstrates the issue, including an artificial/synthetic hash with a known password ... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
20 |
5,249 |
11-15-2019, 08:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask not finding password Straight hit or miss.
Post: RE: Mask not finding password Straight hit or miss...
Also, could you please confirm whether the 'rdgeno' user on these forums is also you?
https://hashcat.net/forum/user-12496.html
If so, why are you creating multiple accounts? |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
20 |
5,249 |
11-15-2019, 08:59 PM |