Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Best strategy for keyword attack
Post: RE: Best strategy for keyword attack
So you know the base word, and you need to append some a special and two numbers?
-r ./rules/hybrid/append_s.rule -r ./rules/hybrid/append_d.rule -r -r ./rules/hybrid/append_d.rule |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,997 |
09-08-2019, 02:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: Best strategy for keyword attack
Post: RE: Best strategy for keyword attack
Because masks are executed on GPU, it's probably much faster to just run it as a hybrid (-a 6) or mask attack. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,997 |
09-08-2019, 03:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: Exploiting the human factor
Post: RE: Exploiting the human factor
That's exactly what hashcat does when using attack mode 3 (brute force, -a 3), and a mask is not specified.
It defaults to this mask:
-1 ?l?d?u -2 ?l?d -3 ?l?d*!$@_ ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3?d?d?d?d |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
11 |
2,908 |
09-21-2019, 06:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: Exploiting the human factor
Post: RE: Exploiting the human factor
Yes, by default if you specify no other parameters other than -a 3, it will automatically increment until exhaustion. IF you want it to terminate earlier, you'd have to specify an --increment-max. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
11 |
2,908 |
09-21-2019, 06:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: Exploiting the human factor
Post: RE: Exploiting the human factor
No utility necessary - honest. :D Study the default, understand how it works, and then adapt it to your needs. :D |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
11 |
2,908 |
09-21-2019, 07:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Unknown Hashes
Post: RE: Unknown Hashes
https://hashcat.net/forum/archive/index.php?announcement-2.html |
|
royce |
General Talk
|
2 |
11,344 |
09-22-2019, 07:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: [PrinceProcessor] Trying to change --pw-max
Post: RE: [PrinceProcessor] Trying to change --pw-max
Modify the source.
Code:
--
--- pp.c-dist 2019-01-14 21:33:46.443328919 -0900
+++ pp.c 2019-09-22 07:25:16.660698312 -0800
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
#define IN_LEN_MIN 1
#define IN_LEN_MAX ... |
|
royce |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
2,080 |
09-22-2019, 05:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Exploiting the human factor
Post: RE: Exploiting the human factor
Yes - the one I first posted. ;)
Study how custom character set works, and replace sequences like this:
?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l
?u?l?l?l?l?l?l?l
?d?l?l?l?l?l?l?l
... with:
-1 ?l?u?d ?1?l?l?l?l?... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
11 |
2,908 |
09-22-2019, 06:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: [PrinceProcessor] Trying to change --pw-max
Post: RE: [PrinceProcessor] Trying to change --pw-max
Yeah, the startup time is non-trivial for sure. A big value of PRINCE is in keeping "state" about which words appear most frequently (based on their order in the original wordlist). So if that's not i... |
|
royce |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
2,080 |
09-22-2019, 08:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: unknown hash type
Post: RE: unknown hash type
https://hashcat.net/forum/archive/index.php?announcement-2.html |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
2 |
1,064 |
09-25-2019, 03:42 AM |
|
|
Thread: Should I be using a rule instead?
Post: RE: Should I be using a rule instead?
There's no way for a single mask to express optional characters (that I'm aware of).
But if you pass a file containing the masks, they are processed in succession very quickly. |
|
royce |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
1,925 |
09-25-2019, 06:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Should I be using a rule instead?
Post: RE: Should I be using a rule instead?
Good point! True for this particular case, but not the more general case. :P ;) |
|
royce |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
1,925 |
09-25-2019, 10:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: My amd gpu hashcat -b -m 17200 can't get the benchmark, the page can't perform hash o
Post: RE: My amd gpu hashcat -b -m 17200 can't get the b...
Thanks for masking the hash!
Could you provide the full commandline you're using, and the output that you get (continuing to mask any hashes)? |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
2 |
1,345 |
10-21-2019, 04:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: MD5 Help
Post: RE: MD5 Help
Do you mean that the plaintext is 32 characters?
If so, then unless you have a strong idea of its composition, bruteforce cannot reach even half of that keyspace. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,655 |
10-21-2019, 06:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: newbie question - rejected passwords stay at zero
Post: RE: newbie question - rejected passwords stay at z...
Password candidates are only rejected when they're not applicable - for example, if the minimum password length supported by the password hash format is 8, and candidates less than 8 are being attempt... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
2 |
960 |
10-29-2019, 06:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: clWaitForEvents(): CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
Post: RE: clWaitForEvents(): CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
If it's only happening for certain hash types, it's probably not a driver problem.
How many rules are you using? This sounds like there are more end-result rules than will fit in GPU memory. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
6 |
2,317 |
10-29-2019, 06:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: TITAN RTX - performance issues?
Post: RE: TITAN RTX - performance issues?
It's OK to use hashcat GUI if it works for what you're trying to do. But many of the things you'll eventually want to do are better done with the command line directly. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
5 |
2,340 |
10-29-2019, 06:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Wordlist optimisation based on ruleset
Post: RE: Wordlist optimisation based on ruleset
There has been some work in this space, but it's a challenging problem. And it's highly idiosyncratic in that the usefulness of any given wordlist and ruleset depends heavily on the nature of the pass... |
|
royce |
User Contributions
|
7 |
4,317 |
10-29-2019, 06:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
Post: RE: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
hashcat currently expects the target hash to be a single file (or a single hash on the command line). |
|
royce |
General Talk
|
5 |
3,007 |
10-29-2019, 06:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
Post: RE: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
Under the Windows command line, the /b switch to copy preserves all original content when concatenating files. In this context, it is the correct switch to use. |
|
royce |
General Talk
|
5 |
3,007 |
10-29-2019, 02:43 PM |