Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Post: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
In this 2011 thread:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-698.html
... someone asked about "wordlist clipping" - being able to truncate passwords instead of rejecting them.
The suggestion at the t... |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,384 |
01-14-2015, 09:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Post: RE: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
For DES crypt, it would be extremely useful to be able to apply existing rulesets that generate passwords longer than eight characters, without modifying them.
DES crypt is a special case because it ... |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,384 |
01-14-2015, 09:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Post: RE: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Awesome - that's *perfect*! That's exactly what I needed to know. |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,384 |
01-14-2015, 10:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Post: RE: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Hmm, still rejecting 60% of my passwords. I dug around a little more, and found this thread:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-3132.html
It turns out that on GPU, using -r to specify a separate t... |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,384 |
01-14-2015, 10:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: PACK-0.0.4
Post: RE: PACK-0.0.4
How far into the analysis was it when you posted these stats?
It's a pretty intense analysis. I am currently processing a 1.3GB wordlist (154,094,601 words), and it's running at roughly 2500 p/s... |
|
royce |
General Help
|
2 |
5,824 |
01-30-2015, 09:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Tridition DES supported ???
Post: RE: Tridition DES supported ???
Hi, oscam. Last I'd heard (2012), key-based DES is not supported.
The hash type 1500 - "descrypt, DES(Unix), Traditional DES" - is not keyed DES encryption. It's a format used to hash passwords o... |
|
royce |
General Help
|
3 |
5,658 |
03-07-2015, 06:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: 6 x 7990's using ASUS BTC mining motherboard WPA2
Post: RE: 6 x 7990's using ASUS BTC mining motherboard W...
The main hashcat page lists statistics for 7970, so double that for 7990s:
https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ (search for 'wpa2')
So if you can get all 6 working, I would guess 142 kh/s x 12 = 1.7 M... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
5 |
10,452 |
04-05-2015, 05:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cisco IOS MD5 BruteForce Mask
Post: RE: Cisco IOS MD5 BruteForce Mask
Assuming that it's this type of hash:
Code:
--
$ openssl passwd -1 -salt 0000 -table password
password $1$0000$aWwcZQIpZ/gD70N/fOUeh0
--
... then you need to specify the hash type (-m 500 = Cisco-... |
|
royce |
General Help
|
8 |
29,656 |
04-14-2015, 05:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: Cisco IOS MD5 BruteForce Mask
Post: RE: Cisco IOS MD5 BruteForce Mask
This looks normal. Brute force automatically starts with short masks and then moves on to longer ones. While it's moving through the short masks, they're too short to really make the GPUs work hard, ... |
|
royce |
General Help
|
8 |
29,656 |
04-14-2015, 08:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
Based on your OS/shell, you'll need to escape the spaces. |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,344 |
04-14-2015, 08:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: office excel 2010 hash
Post: RE: office excel 2010 hash
What command lines have you tried, and what errors were geenrtaed? |
|
royce |
General Help
|
8 |
12,521 |
04-14-2015, 08:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=windows+8.1+cmd+escape+spaces |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,344 |
04-14-2015, 10:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
illcare, I meant it in good humor. That being said, there's a little truth in all humor. If you try random things without research, do not be surprised when they do not work. Wishful thinking does ... |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,344 |
04-15-2015, 05:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Budget Machine for oclHashcat (noob)
Post: RE: Budget Machine for oclHashcat (noob)
1. CPU doesn't matter if you're doing pure *hashcat. If you want to do JtR as well, you might want some CPU.
2. Ignore Radeon. Go NVIDIA. Best bang for buck right now is the GTX 970. For best res... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
2 |
4,701 |
10-15-2015, 05:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Can the source be reduced to a minimal test case, suitable for sharing with the nvcc team? |
|
royce |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,329 |
10-25-2015, 07:40 AM |
|
|
Thread: running two different cards in same machine
Post: RE: running two different cards in same machine
Hashcat will happily use heterogeneous cards. |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
2 |
4,100 |
11-08-2015, 06:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cracking descrypt
Post: RE: Cracking descrypt
Here's one for ZTEX -- source code, but no bitstream.
https://github.com/Gifts/descrypt-ztex-bruteforcer |
|
royce |
General Help
|
3 |
7,718 |
11-08-2015, 08:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA512 Linux
Post: RE: SHA512 Linux
That looks about right, given your card. sha512 is a slow hash.
Code:
--
cudaHashcat v1.38 starting in benchmark-mode...
Device #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4095MB, 1316Mhz, 13MCU
Device #2: GeFor... |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,182 |
11-08-2015, 07:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Opinions on this rig?
Post: RE: Opinions on this rig?
Those cards are two slots wide, but it looks like the card slots are spaced such that you can get all three in there?
epixoip says that the one-fan cards are superior, so that's good.
If you're prim... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,391 |
11-08-2015, 07:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Opinions on this rig?
Post: RE: Opinions on this rig?
It's certainly a solid all-around platform, but it may be more than you need depending on your goals. Are you just looking to do GPU hashcat (oclhashcat), or other things as well?
oclhashcat jobs... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,391 |
11-08-2015, 08:27 PM |