|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark 3 x EVGA GTX SC 970s (Blower) SLI x99 DDR4
Post: RE: Benchmark 3 x EVGA GTX SC 970s (Blower) SLI x9...
| For future searchers, note that SLI is not necessary for hashcat - and adds overhead that actually impacts performance. Instead, allow hashcat to handle the multiple GPUs directly.
https://hashcat.... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
5 |
10,769 |
04-01-2017, 05:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark selection
Post: RE: Benchmark selection
| I am not sure which other algorithms would apply, but I imagine that some algorithms are good for testing differences between AMD/NVIDIA, or between driver versions, or between versions of hashcat. at... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
8 |
9,934 |
10-28-2017, 03:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark selection
Post: RE: Benchmark selection
|
atom Wrote: (10-29-2017, 11:08 AM)
--
Quote:
--
For selecting groups of hashes for focused benchmarking, it might be useful to select all of the ones in a particular family:
--
Doesn't sound ec... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
8 |
9,934 |
10-29-2017, 06:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmarks for GTX 1070Ti FE (Founders Edition)
Post: RE: Benchmarks for GTX 1070Ti FE (Founders Edition...
|
royce |
Hardware
|
3 |
7,855 |
12-30-2017, 05:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmarks for GTX 1070Ti FE (Founders Edition)
Post: RE: Benchmarks for GTX 1070Ti FE (Founders Edition...
| Interesting - good to know! |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
3 |
7,855 |
06-07-2018, 06:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Best bang for buck card(s)?
Post: RE: Best bang for buck card(s)?
| Just throwing some ideas out there:
If cost of electricity is not a concern, agreed about 970s. They're going on eBay for around $200-$220, so 3 of those would be a good fit. (And I wouldn't go old... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
3 |
4,925 |
10-08-2016, 03:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Best bang for buck card(s)?
Post: RE: Best bang for buck card(s)?
| The numbers that I posted, plus the Google doc, should let you compare R9 290X with 970 SC. I prefer NVIDIA over AMD, even with a slightly lower speed, but YMMV. :) |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
3 |
4,925 |
10-09-2016, 05:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Best GPU
Post: RE: Best GPU
| Neither. :) Go NVIDIA, 10xx series (1070, 1080, 1080Ti). If you get Founder's Edition (recommended), the vendor doesn't matter, because they all follow the same NVIDIA spec. |
|
royce |
General Talk
|
8 |
9,094 |
06-14-2017, 08:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Best GPU
Post: RE: Best GPU
|
royce |
General Talk
|
8 |
9,094 |
06-17-2017, 08:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Best strategy for keyword attack
Post: RE: Best strategy for keyword attack
| So you know the base word, and you need to append some a special and two numbers?
-r ./rules/hybrid/append_s.rule -r ./rules/hybrid/append_d.rule -r -r ./rules/hybrid/append_d.rule |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,995 |
09-08-2019, 02:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Best strategy for keyword attack
Post: RE: Best strategy for keyword attack
| Because masks are executed on GPU, it's probably much faster to just run it as a hybrid (-a 6) or mask attack. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,995 |
09-08-2019, 03:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: bitcoin hash not started
Post: RE: bitcoin hash not started
| Does OpenCL work with your card?
What OS, and what version of AMD drivers?
What is the output of hashcat -I?
Edit: it looks like that card has been "no more driver improvements" since 2015?
... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,048 |
11-25-2017, 06:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: bitcoin hash not started
Post: RE: bitcoin hash not started
| According to the main hashcat webpage, this driver version is required:
AMD GPUs on Windows require "AMD Radeon Software Crimson Edition" (15.12 or later) |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,048 |
11-25-2017, 11:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: bitcoin mining vs password cracking?
Post: RE: bitcoin mining vs password cracking?
| You're probably better off just running a benchmark for your specific setup, or using tools like https://whattomine.com/ |
|
royce |
General Talk
|
17 |
18,837 |
10-03-2017, 07:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| Can the source be reduced to a minimal test case, suitable for sharing with the nvcc team? |
|
royce |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,328 |
10-25-2015, 07:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: BLAKE2
Post: RE: BLAKE2
| 259.4 MH/s on my 750 Ti. ;)
(That's with -O and -w 4.) |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,131 |
11-11-2018, 03:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: blowfish brute
Post: RE: blowfish brute
| Just as descrypt (-m 1500) is based on DES (but is much more, because it adds rounds/stretching/etc.), and md5crypt (-m 500) is similarly derived from MD5, it is the bcrypt hash (-m 3200) that is buil... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
17 |
24,505 |
08-31-2016, 11:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: blowfish brute
Post: RE: blowfish brute
| An artificial hash is fine. The $2a$ format is indeed blowfish-based bcrypt.
Can you post the full command line you're using? |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
17 |
24,505 |
09-01-2016, 01:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brain as a centralized potfile?
Post: RE: Brain as a centralized potfile?
| 1. Yes. All candidates are centrally reported and indexed. For slow hashes, this is effective, because it allows all clients to skip those candidates. For fast hashes, this will quickly bottleneck the... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
3 |
2,092 |
12-16-2018, 10:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brain behavior
Post: RE: Brain behavior
| The target hashlist does have to be file-checksum-level identical, IIRC. But I'm not positive. But it also shouldn't be very hard to create a very simple test case to verify it directly. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
2,811 |
12-08-2018, 03:41 AM |
