|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: compiling makefile github
Post: RE: compiling makefile github
| Briefly:
* Don't use The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali). Use a direct OS install.
* Don't use aircrack-ng. Get the caps with https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools (or better ... |
|
royce |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
13,135 |
05-08-2017, 11:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration testing role job?
Post: RE: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration test...
| I can't speak to CPU (other than "generally faster is better" and "at least one core per GPU") or RAM (other than "more than 32GB for analyzing big wordlists").
For density (packing a good amount of ... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
11 |
13,250 |
03-27-2017, 09:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration testing role job?
Post: RE: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration test...
| More cores is good. Current state of the art is NVIDIA (because of the LOPT3.LUT instruction set, I think?) |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
11 |
13,250 |
03-30-2017, 06:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration testing role job?
Post: RE: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration test...
| It is definitely supported by hashcat. Some benchmarks from @epixoip are here:
https://gist.github.com/epixoip/973da7352f4cc005746c627527e4d073 |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
11 |
13,250 |
04-01-2017, 12:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration testing role job?
Post: RE: What GPU and CPU is ideal for Penetration test...
| PCI-E lanes are good for gaming, but hashcat does not care. x1 would even be sufficient for hashcat.
If you intend to use the system for multiple password-auditing purposes, a minimum of x4 might ... |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
11 |
13,250 |
04-03-2017, 07:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
| Based on your OS/shell, you'll need to escape the spaces. |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,344 |
04-14-2015, 08:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
| https://lmgtfy.com/?q=windows+8.1+cmd+escape+spaces |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,344 |
04-14-2015, 10:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
| illcare, I meant it in good humor. That being said, there's a little truth in all humor. If you try random things without research, do not be surprised when they do not work. Wishful thinking does ... |
|
royce |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,344 |
04-15-2015, 05:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Create custom dictionary
Post: RE: Create custom dictionary
| Good question, jallis.
devilman666, since the order is always the same, the example that I provided should apply to your case. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
8 |
13,923 |
04-25-2017, 03:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Create custom dictionary
Post: RE: Create custom dictionary
| Welcome!
Instead of generating a custom dictionary, you're looking for a hybrid or rules-based attack, I think. With these attacks, each word in your dictionary is dynamically modified many times,�... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
8 |
13,923 |
04-25-2017, 03:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: * Device #1: This device's local mem size is too small.
Post: RE: * Device #1: This device's local mem size is t...
| Per: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/master/src/opencl.c
Code:
--
if (device_local_mem_size < 32768)
{
event_log_error (hashcat_ctx, "* Device #%u: This device's local... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
7 |
14,295 |
05-21-2017, 05:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: * Device #1: This device's local mem size is too small.
Post: RE: * Device #1: This device's local mem size is t...
| I included the relevant portion of code. I just included the link the code for reference.
Please read the thread that I also referenced. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
7 |
14,295 |
05-21-2017, 06:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: * Device #1: This device's local mem size is too small.
Post: RE: * Device #1: This device's local mem size is t...
| hashcat supports hardware that is supported by current drivers from the manufacturer. Once the manufacturer drops support for that hardware from the driver, hashcat support also ends. |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
7 |
14,295 |
05-21-2017, 10:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Cracking Build Feedback
Post: RE: New Cracking Build Feedback
| I'd recommend something other than K a l i for the main OS. It doesn't play well with OpenCL and hashcat sometimes. |
|
royce |
Hardware
|
16 |
14,433 |
12-06-2017, 09:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: CL_PLATFORM_NOT_FOUND_KHR Error
Post: RE: CL_PLATFORM_NOT_FOUND_KHR Error
| Do you have an OpenCL runtime installed?
https://hashcat.net/faq/wrongdriver
$ apt-get install ocl-icd-libopencl1 opencl-headers clinfo |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
4 |
14,441 |
05-07-2017, 10:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| To fully take advantage of GPU for a fast hash like MD5, you have to have more than a few rules.
You might try emulating a hybrid attack with generated rules.
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?i... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,530 |
11-22-2017, 04:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| Yeah, like I said in my edit - it doesn't work like I was hoping it would. I don't have a better answer yet.
But notice that what I was trying to do - generate some of the word on GPU with a large ... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,530 |
11-22-2017, 05:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| I'm guessing ... but if I had to say, it's probably that in practice, most attacks are possible without it (by chaining stuff together, Unix-style) - so adding it internally could (arguably) add unnec... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,530 |
11-22-2017, 05:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| You might try increasing the number of masks, to see if that improves performance.
But generally speaking, I suspect that full bruteforce has some attack-specific optimizations that make it pretty ... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,530 |
11-23-2017, 06:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| OK, this is ugly as heck, and buggy (it doesn't fully emulate bruteforce for the last two characters), but it's getting close:
Code:
--
$ for item in `mp64 '?aTEMP?a'`; do echo "di6${item}iE${it... |
|
royce |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,530 |
11-22-2017, 06:20 AM |
