|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking MSSQL(2005) hashes
Post: RE: Cracking MSSQL(2005) hashes
| On the SQL Servers you are authorized to audit:
SELECT sys.syslogins.name
, sys.server_principals.type
, LOGINPROPERTY(sys.syslogins.name,'PasswordHash') AS HashcatFormat
, UPPER(RIGHT(sys.fn_va... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
12,195 |
12-16-2011, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - add support for md5($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06 - add support for md5($p...
| Could this be alleviated instead by a documentation change?
for instance:
md5($pass.$salt): Joomla vX1 to vY1+, App2 vX2 to vY2+, App3 vX3 to vY3+. This is a single md5 hash of the password and s... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
12,825 |
12-20-2011, 04:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (e...
| With a given file of sample hashes, and a small dictionary which should find at least one password without rules, and at least one password with a given rule, I'm getting 0 results in Straight mode, t... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,716 |
03-28-2012, 07:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: RE: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failur...
| I just tested 0.08 with the hashcat 0.39 examples, and got fully correct results on a 6950; I'll test the 6450 out soon and report back. |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,716 |
05-04-2012, 05:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: RE: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failur...
| I just pulled out 0.06, dropped it into the hashcat-gui-0.5.1 directory, and that doesn't work for me either.
Could it be the AMD 6450 512MB card, and/or Catalyst 12.2 (I reinstalled Catalyst with ... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,716 |
03-28-2012, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: RE: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failur...
|
atom Wrote: (03-29-2012, 10:03 AM)
--
you have to reformat the hashes, see my example above
--
Given that there are several SQL 2000 hashes, and two SQL 2005 hashes, and you can see the line length... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,716 |
03-29-2012, 04:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sect...
| I'll run that test and post results.
ETA: Still trying to duplicate the error even with --output-format=7; the "stopped working" error I just posted appears to be more frequent than the output corrup... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
16,173 |
03-30-2013, 07:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: restarting dictionary with rules
Post: RE: restarting dictionary with rules
|
atom Wrote: (06-11-2012, 09:31 AM)
--
No, only oclHashcat-lite can do this. oclHashcat-plus is designed for short runs.
--
I don't know if it's possible, and I understand there are some technical i... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,429 |
06-11-2012, 09:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, "stopped working"
Post: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, "sto...
| Running some tests on the linkedin hash list, with oclhashcat-Plus4 in brute force mode (3), using --remove and --outfile-format=7, at some points when many hashes are being cracked quickly, I'll see ... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,852 |
03-30-2013, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, "stopped working"
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, ...
| This error appears to be highly correlated with https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2182-post-13101.html, "oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections". |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,852 |
03-31-2013, 05:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, "stopped working"
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, ...
| Got it, and I'll put it in the Trac as well.
https://www.adeptus-mechanicus.com/codex/hashpass/hashpass.php (https://www.adeptus-mechanicus.com/codex/hashpass/hashpass.php)
unmasked-100, a.k.a. unmask... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,852 |
03-31-2013, 08:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, "stopped working"
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, ...
| https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/111 (https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/111) |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,852 |
03-31-2013, 09:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sect...
| https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/111 (https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/111) |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
16,173 |
03-31-2013, 09:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: amd catalyst 13.1
Post: RE: amd catalyst 13.1
| What Windows error are you getting with 13.1? See my post about Permission denied followed by "stopped working" - are you getting the same error, or a different one?
What's your command line? What ... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
14,706 |
03-31-2013, 10:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sect...
| Interesting - thank you for the additional information!
I have zero (0) evidence of driver restarts or anything like that, and during diagnosis, I used the ATI Catalyst graphics overclocking sectio... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
16,173 |
04-03-2013, 04:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sect...
| Honestly, I don't know what the "has stopped working" Windows error is, but it not accompanied by the more usual driver crashes where the entire screen freezes/blanks out for a bit, and then the a sma... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
16,173 |
04-04-2013, 06:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: status from gpu cracking?
Post: RE: status from gpu cracking?
| First, you may be confusing the "lite" version with the "plus" version.
lite is designed to operate on a single hash, fed in on the command line.
plus is designed to operate on a file of hashes.
He... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
18,264 |
04-05-2013, 01:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rulesets?
Post: RE: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rul...
| Agreed; however, that's why I was suggesting a conversion to a rules based attack that covers an identical keyspace, rather than forcing me to actually generate and store multiple rules files, rather ... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,933 |
04-18-2013, 04:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rulesets?
Post: RE: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rul...
| Now, that's an approach I'm ashamed I hadn't considered - I was using the Maskprocessor to create single dictionaries of multiple , rather than simply using building block dictionaries and the fact th... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,933 |
04-19-2013, 12:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cisco ASA
Post: RE: Cisco ASA
|
fuzztester Wrote: (10-18-2012, 08:25 PM)
--
I checked out using the maskprocess and piping it in. It does work but I must say, the performance was no where near as fast as a straight brute force mode... |
|
Incisive |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
45,253 |
10-18-2012, 10:15 PM |
