|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Workaround for GLIBC_2.14 not found error
Post: Workaround for GLIBC_2.14 not found error
| Since atom hasn't moved to make life easy for beta testers that don't feel like playing with the mess that is 12.04, I've come up with a workaround.
https://blog.cryptohaze.com/2012/07/using-oclhash... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
0 |
1,860 |
07-04-2012, 07:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
| See new post. I found a way to make this work.
https://blog.cryptohaze.com/2012/07/using-oclhashcat-009-on-ubuntu-1004.html |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,724 |
07-04-2012, 07:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: Bug: file not found reports as hash length excepti...
| Log:
=================
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m0 -a3 -1 ?u?l?d?s example.dict.nothere ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
** Valid keyfile for beta usage: Bitweasil (expires 05.03.2013)
WARNING: Hash 'example.di... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-04-2012, 07:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
| Could you do a tiny bit of sanity checking re the hash type?
-m0 (raw MD5) should never have anything other than [0-9a-fA-F] in it. If other characters are found, it's clearly not a MD5 hash on th... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-04-2012, 05:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Beta 0.09 missing?
Post: Beta 0.09 missing?
| I no longer see any of the -plus betas in /beta - was this a mistake, prep for Defcon, or something else? |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
3,839 |
07-08-2012, 10:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
| They're still a valid format.
Up to you. It seems you already have all the code to test it for reading the hashfile - if the file doesn't exist, and you cannot read it is a valid hash, throw some so... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-08-2012, 10:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2 additional MD5 algos
Post: RE: 2 additional MD5 algos
|
blandyuk Wrote: (09-13-2011, 11:55 AM)
--
Not sure, just did a test and got those. Another 2 which would be useful are:
md5(sha1($pass))
sha1(md5($pass))
--
JTR supports these, as does the Cryp... |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
10,036 |
09-13-2011, 03:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| If you have CUDA, you could use the Cryptohaze multiforcer - it has LM support and handles large lists nicely (including taking 32-character hashes & splitting them - I find LOTS of LM in the hashkill... |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,594 |
09-13-2011, 03:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Lotus HTTP Hash
Post: RE: Lotus HTTP Hash
| The latest SVN source of the Cryptohaze Multiforcer supports unsalted Lotus Domino hashes. Salted support is in the works. |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
14 |
36,908 |
10-21-2012, 06:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: distributed computing for hashcat (cpu)
Post: RE: distributed computing for hashcat (cpu)
| disthc available https://sourceforge.net/projects/disthc/ is likely the best option to start with for this project unless atom adds network support to all the tools. |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
12,475 |
01-05-2013, 01:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How should I store my users passwords in my DB?
Post: RE: How should I store my users passwords in my DB...
| You should use a good, stretched password hashing function like PBKDF2 (perhaps with SHA512), bcrypt, or scrypt. You MUST have a unique, per-user salt (those functions require it).
If you use PBKDF2... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
4 |
10,287 |
07-19-2012, 05:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How should I store my users passwords in my DB?
Post: RE: How should I store my users passwords in my DB...
| One discussion I've had recently with some people for online attacks is to limit both per-IP attempts per second, and per-username attempts per second, with the limit being tripped causing an "automat... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
4 |
10,287 |
07-19-2012, 10:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: understanding the "export DISPLAY=:0" command
Post: RE: understanding the "export DISPLAY=:0" command
| Further, within a display, the ".X" suffix will specify a specific screen/device.
So, DISPLAY=:0 usually means "The GPUs in the system."
DISPLAY=:0.0 means "The first configured screen/GPU" - I thin... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
2 |
93,264 |
01-20-2013, 07:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Catalyst v13.1
Post: RE: Catalyst v13.1
| I don't assume a damned thing about what monstrosity ATI has produced... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
20 |
38,153 |
01-29-2013, 01:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Efficient way to store hashes in database ?
Post: RE: Efficient way to store hashes in database ?
| I wouldn't use MySQL if "fastest request/response time" were a concern.
If you wish to do this, storing them as a binary blob with prepared statements is probably the best option.
However, I would s... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Talk
|
5 |
15,744 |
08-07-2012, 07:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "Code crackers break 923-bit encryption record"
Post: RE: "Code crackers break 923-bit encryption record...
| Does anyone know what algorithm they broke the keys for? I don't see it mentioned anywhere.
And Mem5 - some algorithms simply don't scale well to GPUs. If the analysis is heavily branchy, or has la... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,385 |
10-21-2012, 06:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Does anyone use Flexible x4 PCI Express 4-Way Splitter ?
Post: RE: Does anyone use Flexible x4 PCI Express 4-Way ...
| Very interesting concept.
The x1 speeds shouldn't hurt performance much.
The main problem with stuff like this (in most cases) is that the drivers typically have an 8 device limit (so 4x6990s). ... |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
6 |
20,490 |
07-22-2012, 05:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Does anyone use Flexible x4 PCI Express 4-Way Splitter ?
Post: RE: Does anyone use Flexible x4 PCI Express 4-Way ...
|
sigi77 Wrote: (07-23-2012, 06:54 PM)
--
Im not shure thats possible because the IRQ channels...
--
We haven't used IRQ channels in about 5 years. PCI-E uses message signalled interrupts - there is... |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
6 |
20,490 |
07-23-2012, 11:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Good budget GPU ?
Post: RE: Good budget GPU ?
| Buy a used 7970.
Failing that, perhaps a 7950.
If you plan to do hash cracking, avoid nVidia, and I'd stay clear of the 6xxx cards, as their internal architecture is not nearly as flexible as the 7x... |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
9 |
32,522 |
01-05-2013, 01:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Good budget GPU ?
Post: RE: Good budget GPU ?
| Yes, but edge cases do not a good card make, for most people. The bulk of the hashes out there are MUCH better served by AMD than nVidia, at least right now. |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
9 |
32,522 |
01-05-2013, 01:39 AM |
