Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Workaround for GLIBC_2.14 not found error
Post: Workaround for GLIBC_2.14 not found error
Since atom hasn't moved to make life easy for beta testers that don't feel like playing with the mess that is 12.04, I've come up with a workaround.
https://blog.cryptohaze.com/2012/07/using-oclhash... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
0 |
1,860 |
07-04-2012, 07:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Xeon phi
Post: RE: Xeon phi
It is not currently supported. It flat out won't work - period. |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,597 |
12-18-2013, 12:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Xeon phi
Post: RE: Xeon phi
Because atom has not added support for it yet.
Further, the JTR folks have evaluated it and it's not that impressive for crypto right now. |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,597 |
12-19-2013, 08:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: what gpu to buy
Post: RE: what gpu to buy
For the cost of a 6990, it looks like you can almost get 2 7970s - which will be faster than the 6990, probably use about the same power, and are just a better architecture.
I highly recommend the 79... |
|
Bitweasil |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
19,258 |
07-22-2012, 05:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Usage: hashcat [options] hashfile [mask|wordfiles|directories]
Post: RE: Usage: hashcat [options] hashfile [mask|wordfi...
You need a mask or a wordlist. Try reading the wiki. |
|
Bitweasil |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
17,000 |
02-27-2013, 11:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: understanding the "export DISPLAY=:0" command
Post: RE: understanding the "export DISPLAY=:0" command
Further, within a display, the ".X" suffix will specify a specific screen/device.
So, DISPLAY=:0 usually means "The GPUs in the system."
DISPLAY=:0.0 means "The first configured screen/GPU" - I thin... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
2 |
93,262 |
01-20-2013, 07:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: to build a brute force machine
Post: RE: to build a brute force machine
You are aware that SL3 is no longer supported in any current version of Hashcat, correct? |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
11 |
29,543 |
01-18-2013, 12:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: This copy of oclHashcat-lite is outdated. Get a more recent version.
Post: RE: This copy of oclHashcat-lite is outdated. Get ...
I assume he means GPU. I believe the 4xxx series of cards stopped being supported somewhere around then.
In any case, you can turn your system clock back, or upgrade the GPU. The new version will n... |
|
Bitweasil |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
11,018 |
01-05-2013, 01:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: New Build Questions
Post: RE: New Build Questions
Buy 7970s.
Buy lots of them. :) Or, at least the two that board will fit.
Crossfire or not for gaming, doesn't matter. I'm not sure if it interferes with compute - SLI used to, but I don't know an... |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
7,518 |
02-25-2013, 06:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: New Build Questions
Post: RE: New Build Questions
The Ghz edition is probably worth the money. They tend to be better binned chips. |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
7,518 |
02-25-2013, 08:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
See new post. I found a way to make this work.
https://blog.cryptohaze.com/2012/07/using-oclhashcat-009-on-ubuntu-1004.html |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,724 |
07-04-2012, 07:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Lotus HTTP Hash
Post: RE: Lotus HTTP Hash
The latest SVN source of the Cryptohaze Multiforcer supports unsalted Lotus Domino hashes. Salted support is in the works. |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
14 |
36,896 |
10-21-2012, 06:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
If you have CUDA, you could use the Cryptohaze multiforcer - it has LM support and handles large lists nicely (including taking 32-character hashes & splitting them - I find LOTS of LM in the hashkill... |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,582 |
09-13-2011, 03:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: Interpreting some unlikely results.
Post: RE: Interpreting some unlikely results.
So...
You used the MD5 algorithm cracking, it found plains that, when hashed, lead to the original hash you were testing?
I think the tool is working fine.
It's HIGHLY unlikely that another hash al... |
|
Bitweasil |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
4,976 |
07-17-2012, 07:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: Intel(R) G33/G31 Express, supported?
Post: RE: Intel(R) G33/G31 Express, supported?
Intel currently only supports their CPUs with OpenCL. Their GPUs are generally fixed function and not suited to OpenCL.
This may change with the release of the Ivy Bridge platform in a year or two -... |
|
Bitweasil |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
13,205 |
09-13-2011, 03:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to guide for EC2 instance?
Post: RE: How to guide for EC2 instance?
There's a difference between "Working properly and slow because of the hardware" vs "not working" - please differentiate.
nVidia cards are quite slow for hash cracking, and the Teslas aren't any be... |
|
Bitweasil |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
21,871 |
07-04-2012, 05:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to guide for EC2 instance?
Post: RE: How to guide for EC2 instance?
Why bother intercepting SSH if you control the system? Simply compromise the kernel, or use a hypervisor for introspection. :) |
|
Bitweasil |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
21,871 |
07-08-2012, 10:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: How should I store my users passwords in my DB?
Post: RE: How should I store my users passwords in my DB...
You should use a good, stretched password hashing function like PBKDF2 (perhaps with SHA512), bcrypt, or scrypt. You MUST have a unique, per-user salt (those functions require it).
If you use PBKDF2... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
4 |
10,287 |
07-19-2012, 05:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: How should I store my users passwords in my DB?
Post: RE: How should I store my users passwords in my DB...
One discussion I've had recently with some people for online attacks is to limit both per-IP attempts per second, and per-username attempts per second, with the limit being tripped causing an "automat... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
4 |
10,287 |
07-19-2012, 10:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: Good budget GPU ?
Post: RE: Good budget GPU ?
Buy a used 7970.
Failing that, perhaps a 7950.
If you plan to do hash cracking, avoid nVidia, and I'd stay clear of the 6xxx cards, as their internal architecture is not nearly as flexible as the 7x... |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
9 |
32,519 |
01-05-2013, 01:29 AM |