|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Intel(R) G33/G31 Express, supported?
Post: RE: Intel(R) G33/G31 Express, supported?
| Intel currently only supports their CPUs with OpenCL. Their GPUs are generally fixed function and not suited to OpenCL.
This may change with the release of the Ivy Bridge platform in a year or two -... |
|
Bitweasil |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
13,205 |
09-13-2011, 03:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
| See new post. I found a way to make this work.
https://blog.cryptohaze.com/2012/07/using-oclhashcat-009-on-ubuntu-1004.html |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,724 |
07-04-2012, 07:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: distributed computing for hashcat (cpu)
Post: RE: distributed computing for hashcat (cpu)
| disthc available https://sourceforge.net/projects/disthc/ is likely the best option to start with for this project unless atom adds network support to all the tools. |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
12,471 |
01-05-2013, 01:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: This copy of oclHashcat-lite is outdated. Get a more recent version.
Post: RE: This copy of oclHashcat-lite is outdated. Get ...
| I assume he means GPU. I believe the 4xxx series of cards stopped being supported somewhere around then.
In any case, you can turn your system clock back, or upgrade the GPU. The new version will n... |
|
Bitweasil |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
11,018 |
01-05-2013, 01:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GLIBC problem with Debian
Post: RE: GLIBC problem with Debian
| Hashcat more or less assumes you're running on Ubuntu 12.04 right now.
I wrote up a post on how to install a 12.04 environment in a chroot so you could use the newer versions on older Ubuntu versions... |
|
Bitweasil |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
10,751 |
01-20-2013, 02:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How should I store my users passwords in my DB?
Post: RE: How should I store my users passwords in my DB...
| You should use a good, stretched password hashing function like PBKDF2 (perhaps with SHA512), bcrypt, or scrypt. You MUST have a unique, per-user salt (those functions require it).
If you use PBKDF2... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
4 |
10,287 |
07-19-2012, 05:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How should I store my users passwords in my DB?
Post: RE: How should I store my users passwords in my DB...
| One discussion I've had recently with some people for online attacks is to limit both per-IP attempts per second, and per-username attempts per second, with the limit being tripped causing an "automat... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Help
|
4 |
10,287 |
07-19-2012, 10:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2 additional MD5 algos
Post: RE: 2 additional MD5 algos
|
blandyuk Wrote: (09-13-2011, 11:55 AM)
--
Not sure, just did a test and got those. Another 2 which would be useful are:
md5(sha1($pass))
sha1(md5($pass))
--
JTR supports these, as does the Cryp... |
|
Bitweasil |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
10,034 |
09-13-2011, 03:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Xeon phi
Post: RE: Xeon phi
| It is not currently supported. It flat out won't work - period. |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,597 |
12-18-2013, 12:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Xeon phi
Post: RE: Xeon phi
| Because atom has not added support for it yet.
Further, the JTR folks have evaluated it and it's not that impressive for crypto right now. |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,597 |
12-19-2013, 08:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Build Questions
Post: RE: New Build Questions
| Buy 7970s.
Buy lots of them. :) Or, at least the two that board will fit.
Crossfire or not for gaming, doesn't matter. I'm not sure if it interferes with compute - SLI used to, but I don't know an... |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
7,518 |
02-25-2013, 06:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Build Questions
Post: RE: New Build Questions
| The Ghz edition is probably worth the money. They tend to be better binned chips. |
|
Bitweasil |
Hardware
|
3 |
7,518 |
02-25-2013, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "Code crackers break 923-bit encryption record"
Post: RE: "Code crackers break 923-bit encryption record...
| Does anyone know what algorithm they broke the keys for? I don't see it mentioned anywhere.
And Mem5 - some algorithms simply don't scale well to GPUs. If the analysis is heavily branchy, or has la... |
|
Bitweasil |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,384 |
10-21-2012, 06:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: Bug: file not found reports as hash length excepti...
| Log:
=================
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m0 -a3 -1 ?u?l?d?s example.dict.nothere ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
** Valid keyfile for beta usage: Bitweasil (expires 05.03.2013)
WARNING: Hash 'example.di... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-04-2012, 07:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
| Could you do a tiny bit of sanity checking re the hash type?
-m0 (raw MD5) should never have anything other than [0-9a-fA-F] in it. If other characters are found, it's clearly not a MD5 hash on th... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-04-2012, 05:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
| They're still a valid format.
Up to you. It seems you already have all the code to test it for reading the hashfile - if the file doesn't exist, and you cannot read it is a valid hash, throw some so... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,680 |
07-08-2012, 10:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Interpreting some unlikely results.
Post: RE: Interpreting some unlikely results.
| So...
You used the MD5 algorithm cracking, it found plains that, when hashed, lead to the original hash you were testing?
I think the tool is working fine.
It's HIGHLY unlikely that another hash al... |
|
Bitweasil |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
4,976 |
07-17-2012, 07:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Beta 0.09 missing?
Post: Beta 0.09 missing?
| I no longer see any of the -plus betas in /beta - was this a mistake, prep for Defcon, or something else? |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
3,839 |
07-08-2012, 10:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Workaround for GLIBC_2.14 not found error
Post: Workaround for GLIBC_2.14 not found error
| Since atom hasn't moved to make life easy for beta testers that don't feel like playing with the mess that is 12.04, I've come up with a workaround.
https://blog.cryptohaze.com/2012/07/using-oclhash... |
|
Bitweasil |
Beta Tester
|
0 |
1,860 |
07-04-2012, 07:00 AM |
