|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
Post: RE: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
| I dont have cygwin, but "CR: 0 / 0" says no hashes have been cracked. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,621 |
11-30-2010, 02:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: confused about the command line!
Post: RE: confused about the command line!
| Should be several, actually:
Code:
--
OCLHashcat.exe -m 200 -1 ?l?d?s?u ?1?1?1 ?1
OCLHashcat.exe -m 200 -1 ?l?d?s?u ?1?1?1?1 ?1
OCLHashcat.exe -m 200 -1 ?l?d?s?u ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1
OCLHashcat.exe -m 2... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,875 |
12-07-2010, 12:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: confused about the command line!
Post: RE: confused about the command line!
| Or only 12 days 19 hours 51 minutes 47 seconds(approx.) if you have 1 modern high end card(GTX 480, for example). |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,875 |
12-07-2010, 02:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: confused about the command line!
Post: RE: confused about the command line!
| No problemo!
Now that you mentioned buying a new gpu, I'd suggest buying GTX 580.
It's currently the fastest Nvidia GPU.
It may achieve 6.0B ~ 8.0B p/s for 1 MySQL hash.
Which will again reduce ET... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,875 |
12-07-2010, 04:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| The first.
Left mask works better if it's divisible by 4.
Right is less dependant.
However, I may be wrong.
Maybe ?d?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d is better.
How about finding out? |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-13-2010, 12:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| I did the benchmark.
Each run executed 3 times, then AVG of the time is taken.
?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d?d : 4.3363
?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d : 3.3016
?d?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d : 3.2763
?d?d?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d : 3.625... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-13-2010, 06:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| It will, but it's gonna be slow as a 200 years old grandma.
I suggest using:
Code:
--
?d ?d
?d?d ?d
?d?d?d ?d
--increment ?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d?d
--
|
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-14-2010, 11:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-17-2010, 10:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problems with vbulletin hashes
Post: RE: Problems with vbulletin hashes
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
15,450 |
12-24-2010, 07:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: no salts loaded
Post: RE: ERROR: no salts loaded
| Username:Hash should work.
0.23 worked with 256.xx - 258.96 .
|
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,675 |
12-25-2010, 10:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: no salts loaded
Post: RE: ERROR: no salts loaded
| When Atom gets back, you can PM him for 0.24b which ONLY works with 260.xx . |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,675 |
12-25-2010, 10:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
Post: RE: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
| You probably need 0.24beta.
Contact Atom, then tell us if it worked(which it should). |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
37,448 |
12-31-2010, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
Post: RE: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
| You probably need 0.24beta.
Contact Atom, then tell us if it worked(which it should). |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
37,448 |
12-31-2010, 05:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
Post: RE: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
| You probably need 0.24beta.
Contact Atom, then tell us if it worked(which it should).
Yeah, happy NY to you too. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
37,448 |
12-31-2010, 08:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVIDIA dev driver 260.x - error
Post: RE: NVIDIA dev driver 260.x - error
| I've seen -5 errors on Windows too, which were related to gpu instability.
256.53 - the best for Linux
258.96 - the best for Windows
They are the last drivers which were proper. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,481 |
01-03-2011, 11:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
Post: RE: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
| I think OCLHC reports such clocks because of either 1) The GPU, when you launch oclhc, is in some power-saving idle mode 2)AMD messed something up in reporting correct clocks. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
37,448 |
01-09-2011, 10:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM Algorithm on CUDA
Post: RE: NTLM Algorithm on CUDA
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
8,643 |
01-31-2011, 06:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Looking for help on "gpu-accel" param
Post: RE: Looking for help on "gpu-accel" param
| Fastest mode is -n 320 --gpu-loops 1000/1024 . |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
20,385 |
02-01-2011, 08:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's Linux
Post: RE: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's L...
| Bruteforcing higher than 8 characters on all charset is possible only for huge clusters of gpus.
If you have a cluster of 93 5970's, somehow interconnected, it'll still take you ~26 days of uninterrup... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
36,151 |
02-19-2011, 09:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Error:cuCtxCreate() 214
Post: RE: Error:cuCtxCreate() 214
| This is unrelated, but I noticed that the "stuck at 810Mhz shader" bug appears only if I close one of gpgpu cats improperly, like kill the process, instead of [q]uitting.
Also, doing a [p]ause and th... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
16,729 |
08-20-2011, 02:05 PM |
