|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with -l and -s
Post: RE: Problem with -l and -s
| Oclhashcat does not have simple wordlist attack, and will not have it in the future.
It's made for combo attack, with 2 sides.
So oclhashcat.exe hash_file dictionary_file will not work.
I have no... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
12,488 |
10-16-2010, 07:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Scan
Post: RE: Simple Scan
| OCLHC is designed for bruteforcing, mask and combination attacks.
It is not designed to run simple wordlist attacks. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
17,223 |
11-22-2010, 12:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How can I do this please ?
Post: RE: How can I do this please ?
|
Code:
--
OCLhashcat.exe -m 1000 -n 80 -1 ?l?d?s?u NT.hash ?1?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?d?d
OCLhashcat.exe -m 1000 -n 80 -1 ?l?d?s?u NT.hash ?1?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?d?d
--
But the commands will run for days, even if yo... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
6,917 |
11-23-2010, 12:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Which CUDA should I install?
Post: RE: Which CUDA should I install?
| Since you have access to 0.24 oclhc, you can install any driver > 258.xx for the beta to work.
This is the latest WHQL for your GT 220 (https://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-winvista-64bit-260.99-whql-dr... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,601 |
11-23-2010, 07:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueWriteBuffe<> -5
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueWriteBuffe<> -5
| Contact Atom via PM, or come to out IRC channel. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
20,066 |
11-24-2010, 12:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 fixed？
Post: RE: 5970 fixed？
| No it cant.
Try generating hashes of known plaintexts and then bruteforcing those hashes. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,057 |
11-24-2010, 01:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Each dictionary with mask?
Post: RE: Each dictionary with mask?
| | = OR.
So no, you cant do wordlist1 mask1 wordlist2 mask2
If you would do the math, how long would that take, you prolly wouldnt ask.
No goes to rule file too - Oclhashcat isnt designed for it. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
6,323 |
11-25-2010, 06:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MultiGPU
Post: RE: MultiGPU
| And what are your GPUs ?
Name them(or better yet, provide with GPU-Z screenshots).
If you have AMD gpus then it's ok, AMD never fixed OpenCL-Multigpu on Linux OS.
On windows, it works though(like 4... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,186 |
11-26-2010, 03:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Salt and speed is not correct
Post: RE: Salt and speed is not correct
| Hash question: Digests: 98117 entries, 98117 unique.
Salt question: Salts: 98117 entries, 97812 unique
You are doing everything right, the speed should be crap. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,288 |
11-27-2010, 08:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
Post: RE: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
| If the password is complex, I would try using wordlist + 1-3 letter mask.
Did you try batchcrack.bat in oclhc folder?
It contains quite a bit of fast masks. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,621 |
11-28-2010, 12:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
Post: RE: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
| Depends how extreme you want your cracking to be.
More loops = less responsive desktop = faster cracking. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,621 |
11-29-2010, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: nVidia 263.06 (beta) drivers confirmed working
Post: RE: nVidia 263.06 (beta) drivers confirmed working
| Yep, that's the driver that's been floating around.
It's generally needed to toy with 3.2 release toolkit/sdk.
'Course, I measured even more performance drop with 263.xx than with 260.xx on multiple... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,323 |
11-29-2010, 04:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: nVidia 263.06 (beta) drivers confirmed working
Post: RE: nVidia 263.06 (beta) drivers confirmed working
| 6990 indeed looks amazing from what info has leaked.
It'll be cool in AMD wont introduce new bugs in it, and it will work with OpenCL without glitching. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,323 |
11-30-2010, 02:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
Post: RE: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
|
germes Wrote: (11-28-2010, 04:33 PM)
--
batchcrack.bat??? oh bro I'm nub with this tool ((
How can I edit to mysql5 hash and start batchcrack.sh (batchcrack.bat is not on my 0.23 version (( )?
batc... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,621 |
11-28-2010, 04:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
Post: RE: MySQL5 hash wich mask easily
| I dont have cygwin, but "CR: 0 / 0" says no hashes have been cracked. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
20,621 |
11-30-2010, 02:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: confused about the command line!
Post: RE: confused about the command line!
| Should be several, actually:
Code:
--
OCLHashcat.exe -m 200 -1 ?l?d?s?u ?1?1?1 ?1
OCLHashcat.exe -m 200 -1 ?l?d?s?u ?1?1?1?1 ?1
OCLHashcat.exe -m 200 -1 ?l?d?s?u ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1
OCLHashcat.exe -m 2... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,875 |
12-07-2010, 12:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: confused about the command line!
Post: RE: confused about the command line!
| Or only 12 days 19 hours 51 minutes 47 seconds(approx.) if you have 1 modern high end card(GTX 480, for example). |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,875 |
12-07-2010, 02:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: confused about the command line!
Post: RE: confused about the command line!
| No problemo!
Now that you mentioned buying a new gpu, I'd suggest buying GTX 580.
It's currently the fastest Nvidia GPU.
It may achieve 6.0B ~ 8.0B p/s for 1 MySQL hash.
Which will again reduce ET... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,875 |
12-07-2010, 04:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| The first.
Left mask works better if it's divisible by 4.
Right is less dependant.
However, I may be wrong.
Maybe ?d?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d is better.
How about finding out? |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-13-2010, 12:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
| I did the benchmark.
Each run executed 3 times, then AVG of the time is taken.
?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d?d : 4.3363
?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d : 3.3016
?d?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d : 3.2763
?d?d?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d : 3.625... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-13-2010, 06:50 PM |
