|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
|
Rolf |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-24-2013, 11:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Maximum length of 31? Why?
|
Rolf |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,020 |
04-06-2015, 03:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| Well, DX support says otherwise.
The least it means is it will not be using the original, GCN 1.0 version of 7970's GPU.
EDIT: I may have to take that back, according to the image below.
https://frame... |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-17-2015, 02:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| From ze latest beta
atom Wrote:
--
Type: Driver
File: Host
Desc: added support for all AMD Catalyst >= v14.9
--
|
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-18-2015, 05:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| They can always downclock and undervolt the hell of the GPU, and that would work.
But, whatever's the case, we'll know for sure in 6 days (and they start selling em 3 weeks after that). |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-18-2015, 09:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| Okie dokie, from what I've seen on Techpowerup, the stock variant exists with water hybrid water cooling, non serviceable.
The card was too hot for air cooling (surprise surprise), so no way it's gon... |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-23-2015, 08:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| 450W under hairy doughnut is quite scary for a single GPU card, but, well, competition made AMD desperate.
So far, the card looks better than the abomination I expected.
Heck, if it won't throttle in ... |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-24-2015, 05:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| That's what W1zz @ Techpowerup says. |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-24-2015, 08:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| PCI-E specifications state that one 8 pin cable can supply up to 150W of power, with the PCI-E slot on the motherboard providing up to 75W of power.
One Fury X has two 8 pin connectors, which means... |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-25-2015, 04:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| 432W power draw (https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_Fury_X/29.html) specifically for Fury X under hairy doughnut (Furmark). |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,734 |
06-25-2015, 08:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
| ------>>>>>>A place for your advert here |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
29 |
55,578 |
12-04-2012, 06:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
ocl Wrote: (10-12-2013, 02:33 PM)
--
I think I read somewhere that hashcat started as a fork of JtR or so?
--
https://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/289/314/be3.php |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,490 |
10-12-2013, 06:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| My opinion regarding this whole matter: I enjoy using cats they way they are, no changes in software license are needed. |
|
Rolf |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,490 |
10-14-2013, 01:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed isn’t Everything !
Post: RE: Speed isn’t Everything !
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (09-17-2011, 05:21 PM)
--
Brute force. There are some wifi providers which use 8 character all upper case only, this is now brute-forcible but hashcat+ doesn’t allow u?u?u?u?u?... |
|
Rolf |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
65,994 |
09-17-2011, 07:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed isn’t Everything !
Post: RE: Speed isn’t Everything !
| You can calculate ETA by dividing total number of combinations by current speed.
If that's len8 alpha, then it's 26^8 combination.
As for the progress stuff, well, it's kinda possible, but tricky,... |
|
Rolf |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
65,994 |
09-19-2011, 03:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
Post: RE: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
| Downgrade to 306.97 using this link (https://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us) and see if that changes anything. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
27 |
48,967 |
02-10-2013, 08:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
Post: RE: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
| Nah, it has nothing to do with the OS.
I suggested downgrading just because I'm using those drivers.
One last thing.
A fellow coder had some issues with sm_21 lately(that's your card's architec... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
27 |
48,967 |
02-11-2013, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
Post: RE: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
|
corex Wrote: (02-11-2013, 04:07 PM)
--
Maybe youre right that my cards architecture is the culprit of that error... =(
--
Nope, we made sure it's not that by doing kernel shenanigans.
I'm out of ide... |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
27 |
48,967 |
02-12-2013, 08:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
Post: RE: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
| Atom has a sm_21 card, but it's working a-ok.
Anyways, only he can help you from here. |
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
27 |
48,967 |
02-12-2013, 02:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
|
Rolf |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-23-2013, 05:51 PM |
