|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: Bruteforce + rules
| Consider the following scenario: you have to crack a md5 hash which belong to a password which has a lenght of 16 characters with the following format:
$password = $word . $word;
# password is the du... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,519 |
11-22-2017, 03:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| phahRoe1, thanks for your answer, but...
I know how to use mask attacks, bruteforce attacks, dictionary attack, and rules. And I have read these links too.
In fact, it works. But it is very very... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,519 |
11-22-2017, 04:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| What is the point to generate 857,375 rules when I'm only interested in one of them: duplicate (concatenate with itself) the random word?
Well, you'll get more speed but it'll be based on processin... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,519 |
11-22-2017, 05:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| royce, thanks. I'll try something like that.
Anyway, it would be so easier if there was possible to use rules with brute force attacks. So, what is the reason for not allowing that? |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,519 |
11-22-2017, 02:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| royce, I'm guessing too but from my point of view there shouldn't be any big differences between taking words from a dictionary/file or generating them internally and then apply the rules to them. So ... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,519 |
11-22-2017, 08:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| I think so because if you make a proof using a dictionary file you get a speed similar to that hybrid attack. So it could be another interesting reason to consider allowing the use of rules directly i... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,519 |
11-24-2017, 09:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bruteforce + rules
Post: RE: Bruteforce + rules
| Thank to both very much indeed. I have just tried it and works better than simply generate all of them with maskprocessor (in addition I was trying it on a notebook without a GPU, so the improving is ... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
14 |
14,519 |
11-23-2017, 03:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)
Post: RE: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)
| atom, you should use the same parameter in both cases in order to compare the results...
If you use -w4 with one of them and -w3 with the other one, you are rigging the results, aren't you?
Co... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,852 |
11-22-2017, 02:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)
Post: RE: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)
| royce, I think I have been polite, haven't I? And I haven't said any lie, have I? So I don't understand your words against me (I would like to ask you if you can avoid things like that in the future, ... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
7 |
6,852 |
11-22-2017, 10:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LUKS benchmarks and estimated times
Post: RE: LUKS benchmarks and estimated times
| It will take many thousands of years.
According to the speed indicated by royce, using one of the most powerful graphics cards of the moment:
* if it was only digits, it'd take: 10¹⁰/(10KH/s * 60... |
|
asirena |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,481 |
11-27-2017, 02:53 PM |
