|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: DES cracking speed on 8600 GTS
Post: DES cracking speed on 8600 GTS
| I've tried to crack a DES(Unix) hash with oclHashcat-lite 0.06 using nVidia GeForce 8600 GTS.
Strangely enough, the speed is only about 1.4 M passwords per second (though MD5 cracking speed looks OK ... |
|
moujik |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
1 |
7,394 |
10-01-2011, 12:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 701
Post: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaunchKe...
|
Code:
--
$ ./cudaHashcat-lite64.bin -m 1500 MYDESCRYPTHASH
cudaHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom starting...
Password lengths range: 1 - 55
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperat... |
|
moujik |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
22,336 |
12-08-2012, 04:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 701
Post: RE: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaun...
|
atom Wrote: (12-09-2012, 11:18 AM)
--
DEScrypt requires more resources than MD5. The GeForce 8600 GTS is a bit to cheap.
--
A year ago the same hardware was indeed slow, but at least worked: http:/... |
|
moujik |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
22,336 |
12-14-2012, 03:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 701
Post: RE: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaun...
|
epixoip Wrote: (12-14-2012, 06:29 AM)
--
newer versions require more ram. time to upgrade.
--
Can you please clarify what is the minimum RAM requirement for v0.10? :) |
|
moujik |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
22,336 |
12-16-2012, 07:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 701
Post: RE: v0.10 / Nvidia CUDA / descrypt / ERROR: cuLaun...
|
KT819GM Wrote: (12-16-2012, 08:09 PM)
--
He had in mind GPU RAM. It's possible that 256mb RAM is just too small for its 'enormous' 32 SP count for hashcat kernel to load.
--
I meant Graphics RAM to... |
|
moujik |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
22,336 |
12-18-2012, 03:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
| Just release the Hashcat sources under GPL, remove binaries from site, and...
Let those lamerz compile it on their own :D |
|
moujik |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,446 |
01-01-2013, 10:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
|
undeath Wrote: (01-02-2013, 12:36 PM)
--
moujik Wrote: (01-01-2013, 10:47 PM)
--
Just release the Hashcat sources under GPL, remove binaries from site, and...
Let those lamerz compile it on their o... |
|
moujik |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,446 |
01-02-2013, 06:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Linux & GPL
Post: Linux & GPL
| Please:
remove MS Windows support from Hashcat;
change the Hashcat license to GNU GPLv3;
remove Hashcat binaries from the site;
release Hashcat only as a Linux source code package (maybe even on Gi... |
|
moujik |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
7,544 |
01-02-2013, 06:32 PM |
