|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
|
mastercracker Wrote: (08-29-2013, 03:12 AM)
--
proinside Wrote: (08-28-2013, 10:46 PM)
--
Beta2, cat 13.4
After this crash, running the same command line once, no error (at least, when trying one m... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,528 |
09-16-2013, 11:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
| Here no crashes as well, running simple dictionaires attack with 1.00b6.
Now testing with rules (m3g9tr0n rule file is missing the file extension). |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,528 |
08-30-2013, 03:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
| Beta2, cat 13.4
After this crash, running the same command line once, no error (at least, when trying one more time).
Using a folder with multiple dictionaires freezes again or crash.
https://imgbox.c... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,528 |
08-28-2013, 10:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
| I noted the same behavior, with same drivers, cards 2 x 6990.
Not a problem with 016.b53, but the recent 0.15 and 0.16b72, b73
and b82 have the same behavior.
Didn't report as it could be a problem... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,528 |
08-25-2013, 04:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| Good to know that, atom. Thanks. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,429 |
07-22-2013, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| As an example, rule accepted (at least, with no message...):
l$@$e$a$r$t$h$l$i$n$k$.$n$e$t
Rule not accepted:
l$@$b$t$i$n$t$e$r$n$e$t$.$c$o$m |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,429 |
07-18-2013, 01:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| Can anyone confirm if a rule have a limit in length ?
Rules with length superior to 15 characters gives a "Cannot convert rule for use on GPU" message. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,429 |
07-17-2013, 09:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
| While testing, using a 18 md5 hashes file, running -a 6 and -1 ?l?d?u?s ?1?1:
Test using john.dic and then example.dic.
First with only ?1, then with ?1?1. Will get a crash with ?1?1 or ?1?1?1.
D... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,116 |
07-14-2013, 12:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
| Ok, thanks for your reply epixoip !
Driver installed: 13.4. Windows X64.
Following your suggestion, I did some runs with your clean command line, always using rockyou
dictionaire.
The progra... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,116 |
07-07-2013, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: -a 6 crashing ?!
| I may be wrong, and I might be using the command line in a non correct way. Can anyone confirm this:
- using -a 6
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -a 6 -n 80 -m0 --force --status --markov-disable --disable-po... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,116 |
07-06-2013, 02:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
| Did a few screen captures before start, and at the finish.
The first time, and a second time were done with the same command line, same options,
same hash file, and, as the 4th screen shoot shows, o... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,339 |
05-18-2013, 06:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicat...
| Using d3ad0ne_1.5K.rule:
- hashcat 0.45b6 display 1.540 rules, no rule is skipped
- oclHashcat 0.15b9 display 1.522 rules, some displayed as duplicated and ignored.
Checked the rule file and I ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,227 |
04-26-2013, 03:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat vs oclHashcat - duplicated rules behav...
| Thank you Hash-IT.
Another detail.
Using a rule file with 7.999 rules, got the folowing results:
- Hashcat skip 1.491 duplicate rules, so it work with 6.508 rules.
- ULM sort and remove 1.648 duplic... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,227 |
04-20-2013, 05:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat vs oclHashcat - duplicated rules behav...
| Thanks for the confirmation, atom. This save me from burning GPUs more than needed.
Hash-IT: comment appreciated. Can you open a TRAC ticket, if you please, or send
me a step by step to do it my self... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,227 |
04-19-2013, 03:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - du...
| Using a single rule file, with many rules, not multiple rule files:
- when running hashcat, we get a screen message about the duplicated rules that are skipped by hashcat
- when running oclHashc... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,227 |
04-18-2013, 07:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
|
atom Wrote: (03-31-2013, 12:34 PM)
--
about the changes in 0.45 its strange i see something:
type: feature
file: hashcat-cli
desc: dropped predefined charsets ?h, ?F, ?G and ?R
trac: #55
t... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,339 |
04-04-2013, 01:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
| I'll try to replicate the situation and back with results: command line used, file and results.
May take a while.
About the changes... maybe I downloaded the file too soon ? I have to download it
aga... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,339 |
03-31-2013, 08:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
| Experienced a situation, several times, when using a large md5 hash
list and run with oclHascat-plus 0.15b3 with best64.rule.
Then run the same simple command line again. No result should be
expected,... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,339 |
03-30-2013, 09:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
Post: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
| By mistake typed -m 00 instead of -m 0 and didn't receive any
error message. Not important, I guess, but it's a detail.
The program however still works as MD5 with -m 00, but didn't
check if it gives ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,766 |
03-19-2013, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
| Still using the same dictionaires and remaining hashes file, started
another run, this time with --markov-disable and oclhashcat is yet
founding results, on the second run with this option disable.
... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,851 |
01-31-2013, 09:06 PM |
