|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| oclHashcat-plus-0.09b68 running under Windows 7 64 12.8
A simple test to see the evolution of the speed using 2811 algos,
the last test was with b53, and I'm getting after every second or so
the ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-03-2012, 01:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Just did an uninstall of 12.6 believing that 12.8 was giving
good news. At the moment can't go back to 12.6 and, who
knows, maybe someone around here is still using 12.6 and
can give some feedback.
I'... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,156 |
08-27-2012, 05:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Testing using 12.8 drivers:
- did a run against a list of 6k ipb (2811) and with latest beta, simple dic
attack, using only rockyou.dic file as dic, took 3 minutes;
- then running exactly the s... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,156 |
08-27-2012, 12:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
Post: RE: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
| Thanks for remembering me that atom.
I knew the solution was already defined, but wasn't 100% sure. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,086 |
08-26-2012, 11:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
Post: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
| I think this question was already solved (or not ? can't remember)
when 0.40 was out. I see now the same is happening with 0.40 b1.
Should we expect the program to work like this, and manually
remo... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,086 |
08-26-2012, 01:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 6970 users wanted
Post: RE: 6970 users wanted
| mastercracker, you mean simple dictionary with no rules at all ?
I don't want to "waste" time cleaning the actual driver to install
a new version that do not brings nothing new about this specific
pr... |
|
proinside |
General Help
|
15 |
28,641 |
08-17-2012, 08:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| Probably it depends on what -a 4 is used but, I almost "forgot"
it. This wake up call push me to do a quick run just to
check it and see if it worth.
On a common 4 millions md5 hash list, which had al... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,335 |
08-14-2012, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
| mastercracker, did you decompressed all the files over an already existing folder
or you did it to a new folder (whatever named you might give to it) ?
I guess, if you did it to a new folder, there's ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,280 |
08-06-2012, 10:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 6970 users wanted
Post: RE: 6970 users wanted
| Windows 7 64
Catalyst 12.3
Sapphire 6990
Tested mode: 2611.
Not working since 0.08 version.
Tested 0.08/0.081/0.09 with 14 hashes
Working with 0.07 version !
Already did experience with 12.6 and 12... |
|
proinside |
General Help
|
15 |
28,641 |
07-20-2012, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| lite-0.10, for sure, M@LIK.
lite-0.11 right now doesn't work (at least to me).
Since for global beta testers, plus 0.10 is gone and lite 0.11 looks weird,
I would like to see a kind word for othe... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,120 |
07-08-2012, 11:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| Yes, nothing...
Also, if the program is looking for a "markov_le.llvmir" file, there are a list
of llvmir files in the 4098 folder but not with that specific name.
Creating a, suposed missing directo... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,120 |
07-08-2012, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| Done. No problem with lite-0.10b64. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,120 |
07-08-2012, 11:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Beta 0.09 missing?
Post: RE: Beta 0.09 missing?
| You're not the only one, I also didn't see plus there as well.
So, at least, no vision problems.
Must be something else. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
3,839 |
07-08-2012, 10:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| Thanks for your reply M@LIK.
I did a try with 12.7 beta... maybe is this the source of the problem ?
Anybody else trying 12.7 beta ?
It's quite annoying every time one have to clean AMD drivers a... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,120 |
07-08-2012, 10:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_...
| ... or directory.
Any ideas ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,120 |
07-08-2012, 06:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
|
atom Wrote: (07-01-2012, 09:37 AM)
--
yeah crossfire always caused problems in the past. if you can, remove the crossfire bridge and try again. its worth trying it
--
Yes, I have to do that test. A... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,194 |
07-02-2012, 11:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
|
atom Wrote: (06-30-2012, 08:35 AM)
--
I just updated to 12.6 (final, not beta) on all my linux and windows machines. I can not reproduce this. Any specific command-line I can run?
--
I really did t... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,194 |
06-30-2012, 07:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Question: use of SSD
Post: RE: Question: use of SSD
|
atom Wrote: (06-30-2012, 08:44 AM)
--
I think he is talking about dictionary based attacks. Sure on oclHashcat-lite there will be no difference.
--
You're correct atom.
It is about dictionary base... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
12,843 |
06-30-2012, 06:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| I supose that those with no problems using 12.6 are all on Linux, as no reference
to Windows was done, right (I mean Windows 7 x64) ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,194 |
06-29-2012, 07:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| Yes, I was trying 12.6 with latest plus beta. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,194 |
06-29-2012, 05:31 PM |
