Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat vs oclHashcat - duplicated rules behav...
Thank you Hash-IT.
Another detail.
Using a rule file with 7.999 rules, got the folowing results:
- Hashcat skip 1.491 duplicate rules, so it work with 6.508 rules.
- ULM sort and remove 1.648 duplic... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-20-2013, 05:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicat...
Using d3ad0ne_1.5K.rule:
- hashcat 0.45b6 display 1.540 rules, no rule is skipped
- oclHashcat 0.15b9 display 1.522 rules, some displayed as duplicated and ignored.
Checked the rule file and I ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-26-2013, 03:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
atom Wrote: (03-31-2013, 12:34 PM)
--
about the changes in 0.45 its strange i see something:
type: feature
file: hashcat-cli
desc: dropped predefined charsets ?h, ?F, ?G and ?R
trac: #55
t... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
04-04-2013, 01:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Did a few screen captures before start, and at the finish.
The first time, and a second time were done with the same command line, same options,
same hash file, and, as the 4th screen shoot shows, o... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
05-18-2013, 06:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: -a 6 crashing ?!
I may be wrong, and I might be using the command line in a non correct way. Can anyone confirm this:
- using -a 6
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -a 6 -n 80 -m0 --force --status --markov-disable --disable-po... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-06-2013, 02:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
Ok, thanks for your reply epixoip !
Driver installed: 13.4. Windows X64.
Following your suggestion, I did some runs with your clean command line, always using rockyou
dictionaire.
The progra... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-07-2013, 08:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
While testing, using a 18 md5 hashes file, running -a 6 and -1 ?l?d?u?s ?1?1:
Test using john.dic and then example.dic.
First with only ?1, then with ?1?1. Will get a crash with ?1?1 or ?1?1?1.
D... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-14-2013, 12:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Can anyone confirm if a rule have a limit in length ?
Rules with length superior to 15 characters gives a "Cannot convert rule for use on GPU" message. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-17-2013, 09:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
As an example, rule accepted (at least, with no message...):
l$@$e$a$r$t$h$l$i$n$k$.$n$e$t
Rule not accepted:
l$@$b$t$i$n$t$e$r$n$e$t$.$c$o$m |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-18-2013, 01:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Good to know that, atom. Thanks. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-22-2013, 02:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
I noted the same behavior, with same drivers, cards 2 x 6990.
Not a problem with 016.b53, but the recent 0.15 and 0.16b72, b73
and b82 have the same behavior.
Didn't report as it could be a problem... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-25-2013, 04:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
Beta2, cat 13.4
After this crash, running the same command line once, no error (at least, when trying one more time).
Using a folder with multiple dictionaires freezes again or crash.
https://imgbox.c... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-28-2013, 10:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
Here no crashes as well, running simple dictionaires attack with 1.00b6.
Now testing with rules (m3g9tr0n rule file is missing the file extension). |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-30-2013, 03:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
- i'm getting rule $9$9 as invalid while $9$8 (and the likes in the same sequence) don't show any message
- in a3 mode while using -1 ?l?d the input mask screen shows, as example, while running 6 cha... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,593 |
11-20-2013, 05:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
mastercracker Wrote: (08-29-2013, 03:12 AM)
--
proinside Wrote: (08-28-2013, 10:46 PM)
--
Beta2, cat 13.4
After this crash, running the same command line once, no error (at least, when trying one m... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
09-16-2013, 11:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
The problem #1 has be reproduced.
The test: pick a few md5 hashes, use best64 or shorter rule file and we don't get any error message.
Now edit your rule file and append to the end of that rule file... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,593 |
11-23-2013, 08:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: oclhashcat vs hashcat
You all might already know this, but here it is:
Pick a more or less large, if possible, md5 hash file, and run a simple dictionaire
attack, no rules, no remove option, against your own dictionair... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 12:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Thanks atom !
In fact, many dictionaires have words >=32, so I'll do a test following your suggestion, with latest beta,
and using len.exe tool, and will report back. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 05:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Using the same simple command line as before except adding -o option, b58 is giving an error: hashfile and outfile are not allowed to point to the same file.
This error message doesn't happen using ex... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 07:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
mastercracker Wrote: (11-26-2013, 09:50 PM)
--
Maybe that it's a new check that has been implemented. What was your command line?
--
oclHashcat64.exe -n 80 -m 0 --status --markov-disable --disable... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:03 PM |